Talk:The Hazards of Helen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Film Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the priority scale.
Editing Guidelines Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article: If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film) For more information see: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references. Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film.
Additional Information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no This article may need an appropriate infobox template.

Please add more information about the cast and the crew, discussing the "behind the scenes" aspects of the production process, and giving insights into the casting and staffing where possible. See also Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Style guidelines for more advice.

Contents 1 Longest? 2 23.8 hours 3 Fair use rationale for Image:HazardsofHelen-Nerves.jpg 4 Fair use rationale for Image:HazardsofHelen-Nerves.jpg

[edit] Longest?

No offense, but James Bond (the "official" films) surpassed 24 hours with For Your Eyes Only, released in 1981. Perhaps it should be clarified what category of series this is the longest of. --Dhartung | Talk 23:45, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

Before: At 23.8 hours, it is believed to be the longest motion picture series ever filmed.

After: At 23.8 hours, it is believed to be the longest non-feature length motion picture series ever filmed. -- User:zanimum

Anybody know the cumulative runtime for the Our Gang series? It surpasses Helen in number of episodes, and some of those were two reels while Helen seems to have been (mostly?) one reel episodes. Cdixon 18:12, 16 September 2005 (UTC)

Our Gang's cumulative runtime is easily double that of this series (and that's disincluding the feature General Spanky). My rough estimate - (145 two reelers x avg. 17 min runtime) + (75 one-reelers x avg. 9 min runtime) places Our Gang at about 52.3 hours. --FuriousFreddy 05:02, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 23.8 hours

This seems to my (inexpert) eyes rather an ugly way of writing the length; wouldn't "23 hours 48 minutes" (or whatever the exact total is) be better? Loganberry (Talk) 00:56, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:HazardsofHelen-Nerves.jpg

Image:HazardsofHelen-Nerves.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:28, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:HazardsofHelen-Nerves.jpg

Image:HazardsofHelen-Nerves.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:28, 5 June 2007 (UTC)