Talk:The God Channel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject Television Stations, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Television stations. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

	Christianity Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Charismatic Christianity. (with unknown importance)
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

[edit] GOD UK Year Dates Messed Up

Somebody Edited The Year When GOD UK Was Realesed/Renamed And Replaced It With A Question Mark Sign, Can Somebody Fix This.

Frank0115932 01:15, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Encyclopeadia's should not contain weasel words

The God Channel has attracted criticism from some commentators; television satirist and critic Victor Lewis-Smith described it as "hour upon hour of hate-filled, rabble-rousing, homophobic bigotry, much of it featuring (and funded by) right-wing American evangelists" [1].

I moved the above from the article as it is factually incorrect to have in an encyclopaedia17:25, 23 February 2007 (UTC)Halesowen

I've reverted your changes because the text you have deleted is not "factually incorrect" as it is a published statement properly attributed to the source. Further, please go reread WP:AWW, the Wikipedia style guideline regarding "weasel words." Attribution of a source of a critical statement is not the use of "weasel words." Mike Doughney 19:16, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

I can only reaffirm what Mike said above. "Weasel words" do not mean what you think they do, read the linked article. Lewis-Smith is a noted commentator, and his opinion was presented as that of a third party. Fourohfour 13:45, 25 February 2007 (UTC)