Talk:The Field

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Film Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.
Editing Guidelines Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article: If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film) For more information see: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references. Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film. Article upgrading needed: You can help! WP:IA   Stub to Start-Class Upgrading Instructions for Films Note that instructions for articles on other types of film topics within the scope of WikiProject Films are currently under development. To contribute in upgrading this stub article to Start class, the following requirements must be met: Significant intro (list the title, alternate titles, year released, director, actors starring in the film, summary of headings, etc.) Film infobox ({{infobox film}}) Picture: Consult WikiProject Free Images for freely released images from a film shoot, opening, or other relevant free image. Non-free and unlicensed images are to be avoided if at all possible, but if used should include a detailed fair use rationale. (An image is not required for start class if unavailable.) Plot summary Include cast and crew information. At least two other developed sections of information (production, reception (including box office figures), awards and honors, themes, differences from novel or TV show, soundtrack, sequels, DVD release, etc.) Categories (by year, country, language, and genre(s))  Helpful links: WP:BETTER, WP:LEAD, WP:REF, WP:WAF Once this article has fulfilled these requirements, the film can be reassessed to Start class and this template will be removed automatically.
Additional Information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no

It was not mentioned that Bull's henchman was played by John Hurt, English actor of some renown. In addition Bull was played by Richard Harris , an Irish actor known for Arthur in Camelot, Albus Dumbledore in "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone" and numerous othe movies.

[edit] Removed paragraph

I removed the following paragraph, which refers to differences between the original play and the later film adaptation:

In this adaptation, the character of Bird O' Donnell appeared as Bull's simpleton henchman, which was not the case in the original play, also he didn't whistle like he had in the play and was much active. In the play, he was a clever middle-aged laidback alcoholic, who appeared as a much more neutral character rather than being on siding with morals or siding with Bull McCabe.

Normally, I'd try to fix something like this, but in this case I can't make out what the author was trying to say. I guess "and was much active" probably was meant to be "and was much more active," but "rather than being on siding with morals or siding with Bull McCabe" is completely opaque to me.

I suppose if I had seen the play, or if I had seen the movie more recently, I may be able to work it out. Certainly, the paragraph is enumerating a few specific differences between the play and the film. As such, I'm not sure that it adds to the article; but if someone wants to clean it up and put it back in, I won't take my GI Joe and go home or anything. —CKA3KA (Skazka) 00:36, 18 January 2007 (UTC)