Talk:The Fall of the Templar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Literature Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has an infobox template in need of a Cover! (prefer 1st edition)
	This article is supported by the Science fiction task force. (with unknown importance)
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

[edit] Notability

Strong Keep The article is vert good. This is a situation where Orange Mike would have to delete every article about the grey griffins novel King Rock ^{Go 'Skins!} 21:09, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

As has been explained to you before, Kingrock, just saying that the article is good and the work notable is not enough. You have to prove that the book (and the others from this series) fulfill notability guidelines by providing reliable sources (perhaps from critical reviews that attest to its popularity; a fansite doesn't cut it). If you do this, and notability is provided, then the articles cannot be deleted. María (habla conmigo) 21:41, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

• Keep. To keep the article from being deleted, my advice would be to put all the individual articles into one good article. Don't have an article for each book. And, most important, you must find references. I've added two book reviews for this particular book. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 19:21, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
• Keep - on balance it appears notable enough however the article needs to be better at asserting such a claim. The further reading section also appear to be a references section in another guise so I will relabel. :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 08:39, 27 April 2008 (UTC)