Talk:The Fahan School

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Portal	The Fahan School is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tasmania.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Education in Australia.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

	This article is related to WikiProject Schools, an attempt to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.	Schools Portal
Low	This article has been rated as low-Importance within Schools.

[edit] deletion

should not be deleted, all high schools are notable, the schools website is source enough^{T ALK}•^QR_C2006•¢ʘñ†®¡ß§ 18:29, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Disagree about website - it is not sufficient - however 2 seconds flat found a third party published source - why does no one actually ever check for sources before putting tags like that? WP Civility and Other policies retrain me from adding further comment about such a tag SatuSuro 00:58, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

• Folks have a good look at the prod tag it had nothing to do with notability - it wasn't even titled notability. Schools are of course notable! My tag was for verifiability. Have a look by clicking here as it explains which editor has the burden of proof in relation to proving verifiability... In the case of this article then the question still arises whether all of the middle part under the heading Timeline is verified? I would say not and if it can't be verified then the whole section should be removed? I would rather wait a day or two before that happens.--VS ^talk 14:03, 2 June 2007 (UTC)