Talk:The Elder Scrolls IV: Shivering Isles
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| Low | This article is on a subject of low priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0. | |
|
VG To-do:
|
||
 |
This article is part of WikiProject The Elder Scrolls, focused on organizing TES-related info in Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and discuss any suggestions concerning articles on the talk page. |
Contents |
[edit] Rewrite
The "Overview" looks like it writen by a 12 year-old, It's probably best just to delete the whole thing and copy and paste the filler description from Bethesda's webpage untill someone rewrites it.
- I'm going to delete some of the useless infomation in the overview, nobody wants or needs to know about who reviewed first.124.176.44.158 22:39, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- It looks like someone vandalized the overview section... and possibly more... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.190.22.200 (talk) 21:49, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Warning!
I just got this game and I think theres a bug, because my characters all move backwards slowly and glitch forward even slower! is this just mine?--Daniel Berwick 01:04, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- It might not just be yours, but it's not a universal bug, since this is the first time I've heard of it. Probably doesn't need to go into the article. VoidTalker 16:46, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Please correct the spelling errors that saturate this page.
[edit] Retail package
Is there any info on a retail package being released. I read about it somewhere, I think. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.226.180.162 (talk) 17:05, 3 April 2007 (UTC).
I remember reading that as well, but IGN said that a retail version was not going to happen. I believe it was mentioned in their review. I'll try to find this later.--Cyrus Andiron t/c 13:49, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Yeah it was in game informer. They are usually reliable. 63.231.129.229 23:06, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Spoiler warning required
The overview section requires a spoiler warning as it gives details of plot ending and twists... I don't know much about editing but I'll give it a go myself, will probably need cleaning up after though anyway --Careless hx 14:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Hmm that was easier than I thought... might be worth splitting the marked section off into a new section called 'Plot' but I'll leave that for someone else to decide --Careless hx 14:17, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Either it was reverted or something went wrong. I think it should be slightly rewritten so the spoilers can be flagged separate from the general plot outline. MassiveDamage 05:50, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
- The thing is, a spoiler tag isn't needed. This isn't a game site, it's an encyclopedia - we are supposed to cover everything, whether that means including "spoilers" or not. The Wikipedia:Content disclaimer says as much. An article on a game has to discuss some aspects of gameplay, characters, and plot details - this is the expected norm, not something that needs a warning tag. — Carl (CBM · talk) 06:01, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
- I agree. I note that the tag was placed in the overview. Obviously it will give details, because this is an encyclopedia. Generally speaking the spoiler tag is redundant if it appears to flag something where one would expect to find it.--Tony Sidaway 09:55, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
- I used wikipedia a lot in past to get information about books and such. Every time there were spoilers in article, they were flagged. I expected similar here and was dissapointed with lack of it. Simple "spoilers below" would be enough. (83.142.223.24 17:14, 27 August 2007 (UTC))
- I agree. I note that the tag was placed in the overview. Obviously it will give details, because this is an encyclopedia. Generally speaking the spoiler tag is redundant if it appears to flag something where one would expect to find it.--Tony Sidaway 09:55, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] FormID reference bug
I removed the FormID reference bug section per notability. If someone feels it is, do say why. --85.5.167.247 06:20, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Publisher
I have a copy of Shivering Isles (including Knights of the Nine) for the XBox 360 in front of me, and it says it was published by Ubisoft, not 2K games. Could somebody look into this? --Muna (talk) 11:56, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
