Talk:The Devil Went Down to Georgia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Cleanup
I put in new headlines and reorganised the article a bit, but I dunno if I should remove the cleanup tag or not. The page needs a song info box, I think...but I wouldn't know how to put one of those up. --Gromreaper 03:56, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Infobox and such
I tossed in an infobox, but I know very little about the single, so I couldn't add much. I'd appreciate anything anyone can add in.
Also, we can't have the lyrics there like we did. The Son Of Nothing 15:49, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
If lyrics and infoboxes can't do anything, then what can? MKguy42192 (talk) 04:51, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Genre
According to wikipedia's own website this is, in fact, a country song.
See Charlie_Daniels:
"Daniels won the Grammy Award for Best Country Vocal Performance in 1979 for "The Devil Went Down to Georgia", which reached #3 on the charts."
[edit] Stephen Lynch
In Stephen Lynch's song "Beelz" (about a flamboyant version of Satan) he makes a joke stating that the devil "would never be caught dead in Georgia" (after imitating the Charlie Daniels Band briefly) This isn't really a parody, and i'm not nearly good enough at editing wikipedia to add it in a relevent section.
[edit] Spoilers?
Do we really need a spoiler warning? It's a song for crying out loud. Ungovernable ForceGot something to say? 06:31, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Devil went to Jamaica
This song was written by Travis Meyer http://www.drdemento.com/playlists/drd98.0815.html when he was at WBYR-FM.
[edit] Coyote Ugly
Should there not be some reference to the song being A) Used in the movie Coyote Ugly (film) as the main bar song, but more importantly that this is one song that every Coyote Ugly Saloon bar uses for the girls to get on the bar and do their routine? I think it's worthy of the recognition. Don't you?? Timclare (talk) (sign here) 02:28, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:MillionMileReflections.jpg
Image:MillionMileReflections.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 17:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Covers/Adaptations/Parodies Sections
Since I was reverted, I'll go here. Please cite those sections, and show how they are important to this article. Otherwise, they will be removed per WP:V and WP:TRIVIA. seresin | wasn't he just...? 00:35, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- I more or less second this, except I wouldn't be too hasty flat out removing them. Obliterating them will only serve to offend and aggravate the regular editors and I don't want to see edit warring here. As it stands, the tags should stay, if no improvement or attempt to trim, prune, integrate, or improve said sections is seen, then we should consider deleting the most trivial parts flat out. Wisdom89 (T / C) 01:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- I concur with the sentiment expressed above. There is some good information in these sections that I would hate to see removed and should remain in the article in some form, but in its present form it has too much. It needs to be pared down, and some of the less important or more tenuous entries removed, and these three sections combined into one or two. At a minimum, the Covers and the Adaptations sections look like they could be combined. --Mwalimu59 (talk) 06:02, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- Very little of the content in the sections I listed is relevent. In addition, it is not cited. seresin | wasn't he just...? 01:56, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
I've added the examplefarm template to the header as I believe it more concisely addresses the problem of having too many adaptations/covers/parodies than the trivia tags did. I've also removed the comments about Guitar Hero since they seem overly pedantic. We can add some of those back later if that particular problem rears its head again. --Mwalimu59 (talk) 17:20, 29 February 2008 (UTC)