Talk:The Dark Side of the Moon Live

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This Pink Floyd-related article is within the scope of WikiProject Pink Floyd, a collaborative effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Pink Floyd, their members, associates, albums and songs. You can help! Visit the project page, discuss an article at the project talk-page, or even join us!
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.)
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Contents

[edit] Stage

Does anyone know what kind of main video screen they were using? When we first sat down (far in the back), I swore the bottle and radio were giant props, until the hand changed the station! I've never seen a screen that large with resolution that good before. Eric Soyke

[edit] Concert Pictures

Hi. If any more concert pictures are needed for this page I have high res, original pictures from the 26th of June Stavanger concert. I have a total of 11 pictures, some of them are used here: http://www.pinkfloydz.com/roger2006/index26june.htm If any pictures are needed for this article, drop me a note on my talkpage and I will be happy to upload some for any editor that might need them. Clq 17:01, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Ah well, I learned how to use commons, so now they are all here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Roger_Waters 213.167.126.215 15:34, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Completed

Do we really need the word COMPLETED before each of the completed dates? I would of thought it was pretty obvious that the gig had happened by the date... (obv. have a note if the show was postponed/cancelled, etc) Lugnuts 18:57, 8 Aug 2006

Mah, maybe not.--Doktor Who 19:24, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
Certainly not. The gigs will all be completed pretty soon, so it's not very encyclopedic. BotleySmith 23:38, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Miming

From edit summary 69021242:

"The entire "miming" section was completely unfounded, and frankly, full of hearsay and unsubstantiated claims".

Spoken likAe someone who doesn't want to believe what they're hearing. Admittedly, the paragraph I put in was heavily based on original research. That said, the debate (which seems to be the most common theme of all the show reviews I've read) is over how much Roger mimes during this tour, not whether he does or not. We should at least try to acknowledge the fact that Roger mimed during the Rio performance (the TV broadcast feed did not match the audience recordings), and has done so on previous tours. For proof of this last claim, see the Stachel interview I linked to:

BD: Is it true that Roger (rather sensibly) used a handful of pre-recorded vocal segments to save his voice from too much strain? When I met him at Wembley his voice was struggling and he was sucking lozenges. I'd much rather artists used the odd pre-recorded segment (selectively) rather than have to cancel shows...
NS:Yes, and I agree.

This is obviously a touchy subject, but that's no reason to remove all acknowledgement of it from this encyclopedia. BotleySmith 22:00, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

And are you going to do the same for every article dealing with a rock singer or for Waters only? Dr. Who 22:12, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Well, if the leitmotif in every review of that rock singer's concerts is a debate on what parts were mimed, then I'd say it warrants inclusion. BotleySmith 22:33, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
If other Wikipedians say so..., but I see none here. I do not think it is encyclopedic, though it is worth to be included in a gossip magazine. Brain-damage website is a fan site, and its information is not always regarded as encyclopedic. --Dr. Who 22:50, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
There is none else here at Wikipedia, at least not now.Dr. Who 22:54, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
I, as a Roger Waters fan, have no problems admitting he might have mimed during have a cigar on the Stavanger concert. However, the section was written in a very gossiplike way. If the section was written in a way that dosnt accuse of miming, but rather note that miming occored on some songs on some of the concerts it would be ok in my opinion. Lines like the ones saying "It may have been perfected to perfection" though are totally unfounded. If he is mining you can both see and hear the difference. Clq 23:03, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

213.132.125.46 01:32, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

I saw Roger in Shanghai and clearly what he sings does not come through to the speakers. Several times he was out of sync and at one stage in the concert, when he was going to say something, then it turned out that his microphone was not on.

This is not a question of a sore throat. The show is designed and produced with his voice on tape.

With this in mind, I think the ticket buyers should be warned of this fact before forking out $100 or $200 for a seat. The miming section should remain in the main article.

213.132.125.46 01:32, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Having been at the Stavanger concert, at least there he was NOT miming the whole show. I have seen audience recordings around on the net, and at least one some songs there are parts where I hear a clear difference in the vocals from what I can remember hearing. So the statement that the whole show is "designed and produced with his voice on tape" is false. It is indeed designed and produced, perhaps more than some would desire. Clq 15:40, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Since the 1980s Roger has mimed certain vocal parts at his shows. "Every Strangers Eyes" is an example - go find a YouTube audience bootleg and you'll find the bridge vocal is the vocal on Pros and Cons of Hitckhiking album. It's like this on his "In The Flesh" live album, too. And that's okay. His voice was abused and destroyed and he saves it by only doing things like that in the studio. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.212.221.225 (talk) 02:28, 27 March 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Vera at Shoreline

Vera was not omitted from the October 10th show at Shoreline. I was at this show, and I distinctly remember the song just after Another Brick in the Wall Pt. 2 and before Bring the Boys Back Home. I have changed it back until somebody provides a link.

[edit] Unconfirmed Dates

I really don't feel as if putting dates which are unconfirmed (even if they are strong rumours) is worth it. In theory, any date/locale could be put there and be "unconfirmed" I'm going to remove them, if anyone feels like they should be there, say so. Evilive

[edit] Pig graffiti should stay at Pink Floyd pigs

I propose that all the "graffiti" information be collected at the Pink Floyd pigs article, rather than copied both places - it would make this article much cleaner if the graffiti section here was reduced to a simple introduction and a link to the more in-depth article. Something like:

"Pink Floyd's iconic pig has been used extensively during the Dark Side of the Moon tour, appearing at almost every venue. During the tour, the pig has often carried messages critical of the American government, and in support of repressed Latin American populations, including indictments of discrimination and calls for the further prosecution of former dictators. A complete list of the pigs and messages featured at each show can be found at Pink Floyd pigs."

After all, this article is about the tour as a whole, and if we already have an entire article focused on the pigs, we don't need a "trivia" section here about them which copies all the information from the other article. PaladinWhite 12:48, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

After recieving no response here, I have removed the triva section, and added a link under "See also." Information was moved to Pink Floyd pigs.

[edit] Is a citation REALLY needed?

I noticed that the infobox, at present, has:

Legs — at least 6 [citation needed]
Shows — at least 108 [citation needed]

The legs are defined in the article and the show list is recent. Sure, "at least" indicates the number is not final and subject to a change, but is this not like demanding a citation for the number of States in the USA on the same page as a list of them? --74.12.86.174 22:58, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Pass To The Dark Side Nav-1.jpg

Image:Pass To The Dark Side Nav-1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:30, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Pass To The Dark Side Nav-1.jpg

Image:Pass To The Dark Side Nav-1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:09, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Dsotmlive.PNG

Image:Dsotmlive.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:23, 13 February 2008 (UTC)