Talk:The Creationists

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Creationism Portal This article is supported by the Intelligent design WikiProject. This project provides a central approach to Intelligent design-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

[edit] reviews & criticism

I really couldn't find any lengthy reviews that were critical, and even reviews from the Christian press were largely positive. I'm told, however, that some Christians dislike this book, so I tried to find a cite; the best I could find was a cite to customer reviews at amazon.com. If someone can produce a better cite to a published review, great. Otherwise, I think that in the general praise is well-referenced, and the suggestion of criticism is real, albeit perhaps not as well-referenced. --Lquilter (talk) 18:33, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

HRAFN deleted them, and it's fine with me -- I was just trying to stave off the inevitable complaining. --Lquilter (talk) 19:32, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Synopsis

Having just read through the book, I think that there is a great opportunity here for some major additions to the article. Does a synopsis of the book require links? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Minnyhaha (talk • contribs) 16:43, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Everything should be referenced, if that's what you mean. An overview of what is in the book would be great. --Lquilter (talk) 00:15, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

I think it is taken as read that the citation for a synopsis of the book is the book itself. Specific citations would only be necessary for quotes, extraordinary claims, etc. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk 02:39, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Yep. I wasn't sure what was meant by links, so I just meant, no other links, like links to parts of the book or online versions, are needed. Thanks for clarifying. --Lquilter (talk) 19:22, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks Lquilter and Hrafn. I'll probably start working on it in a week or so as I have some real life projects I need to work on first. Minnyhaha (talk) 12:28, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Great! I'll help w/ copyediting etc. I've got some busy-ness ahead of me, too. --Lquilter (talk) 19:22, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

de:The Creationists Perhaps this can help you. Greetings. -- Andreas Werle (talk) 20:20, 5 February 2008 (UTC)