Talk:The Coronas
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Ireland on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the priority scale. | |
The first band to ever use the name 'The Coronas' was a band in Belfast. Consisting of 3 members. Daniel Saunders, Ciaran Denver and David Meek. David Meek is no longer in the band and Daniel and Ciaran jam all the time creating mystical and trippy funked out stoner rock songs. Both Ciaran and Daniel are now in separate bands. Ciaran is in a band called Graffiti Junction and Daniel is in a band called The Audiables. Both bands are doing very well for themselves. This does not mean that The Coronas from Belfast have ceased their musical creation, they see each other everyday and jam when the opportunity arises.
The Coronas from Dublin, please at least give us some credit for having the band name first...how would you feel in our situation?
There were probably loads of bands called The Coronas. This particular band however, are the first commercial band to use the name with the massive amounts of radio play, big gigs, festivals, tv appearances, chart positions...the works. Therefore, credit is not due to everyone who were "once in a band called the Coronas". Come on man! (Jackpollock (talk) 19:41, 1 February 2008 (UTC))
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:TheCoronasDecisionTimeCover.jpg
Image:TheCoronasDecisionTimeCover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 15:29, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:SanDiegoSong.jpg
Image:SanDiegoSong.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 01:09, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Selective editing
I provided two referenced entries in an edit, one about the parents of Danny O'Reilly being connected to the band's label, and another about the criticism the album received. Like I said, both were referenced with valid sources (The Irish Times and Mary Black's website). However, someone edited them out and replaced them with positive statements. Prior to my first edit, the article had read like an advertisement; I was merely trying to balance it out a bit, and point out that they haven't been met with universal acclaim as the article may have suggested. I have no feelings on the band either way, they don't bother me that much, but this sort of selective editing undermines Wikipedia completely, and so I'm going to revert User:193.203.134.19's edits. —Preceding unsigned comment added by NaLaochra (talk • contribs) 11:45, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
