Talk:The Compendious Book on Calculation by Completion and Balancing
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
The Compendious Book on Calculation by Completion and Balancing is part of WikiProject Middle Ages, a project for the community of Wikipedians who are interested in the Middle Ages. For more information, see the project page and the newest articles. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. | ||
|
Article Grading: |
|||
|
WikiProject Middle Ages To do:
|
|||
Contents |
[edit] al-Jabr
The explanation of the al-Jabr operation cannot be correct:
The al-Jabr operation is subtracting a quantity from one side of the equation and adding it to another.
Applying this to:
a = b + c
gives:
a + b = c
Which is clearly inconsistent. Someone with more expertise on this book needs to substitute the correct definition of what the al-Jabr operation was. Furby100 22:07, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
- Fixed some time ago. Mukadderat 23:53, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Unsolvable cases
Does anyone know whether al-Khwarismi had any consideration of "unsolvable" cases like x2 + 4 = 0, not covered by the 6 solvable cases? Mukadderat 23:53, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
al-Khwarizmi does not cover them, but such equations occasionally appear in later algebraists, such as Ibn al-Ha'im and al-`Amili. ---Jeff Oaks
[edit] Title, al-jabr, al-muqabala
Before I give some brief comments on this article, I want to say that the errors are not those of the author, but of the secondary sources he/she used.
This article has many errors. The first is that "al-mukhtasar" in the title of al-Khwarizmi's book does not mean "compendious", but is better translated as "condensed", "brief", or "abridged". Also, "al-jabr wa'l-muqabala" was the medieval name for the art of algebra, so the title is better rendered "The condensed book on algebra".
- That is exactly what "compendious" means, though in modern times it is often confused for a synonym of "encyclopaedic". Hv (talk) 01:52, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
The book does not provide algebraic and geometric solutions to the 6 types of equation. It gives a numerical recipe for the solution, and then offers geometric proofs that the method is valid.
The three types of algebraic number were mal (literally "sum of money", "treasure", etc., for our x^2), jidhr (lit. "root" for our x), and `adad mufrad ("simple number"). In the worked out problems shay' ("thing") was usually used in place of jidhr, and simple numbers were counted in dirhams, a unit of currency. Later algebraists substituted `adad ("number") or ahad ("unit") for dirham.
Regarding the operations al-jabr (restoration) and al-muqabala (confrontation), see my article "Simplifying equations in Arabic algebra" (with Haitham Alkhateeb) in an upcoming issue of Historia Mathematica. The article is already available online:
http://authors.elsevier.com/JournalDetail.html?PubID=622841&Precis=DESC (click on "tables of contents and abstracts")
Medieval mathematicians had no concept of negative numbers. In an expression like "ten less a thing" (10 - x) both the 10 and the x are positive. Do not confuse the simple idea of subtracting positive numbers with the existence of negative numbers. Further, for them "ten less thing" (10 - x) was thought of as a deficient ten, which has had x removed from it. The operation has already been carried out. In an equation like 10 - x = x^2 (ten less a thing equals a mal) one is instructed to "restore" (ajbir, conjugated from al-jabr) the deficient 10 to make it a full 10. Then an x needs to be added to the other side of the equation. This is a two-step process.
Al-muqabala means "confrontation". In an equation like 2x + 10 = 5x the 2x and the 5x are "confronted", which entails bringing them face-to-face and taking their difference.
For a good overview of Arabic algebra, see Ahmed Djebbar's 2005 book _L'algèbre arabe : Genèse d'un art_.
---Jeff Oaks
[edit] Syncopation
The main article uses the term "syncopation", as in "none of the syncopation found in greek, etc." I am not familiar with this sense of the term "syncopation". Does the author mean "formula", "abbreviation"? Katzmik 13:24, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- Hopefully this will answer your question:
Boyer (1991). "Revival and Decline of Greek Mathematics", p. 178, 180-182.
...The chief difference between Diophantine syncopation and the modern algebraic notation is the lack of special symbols for operations and relations, as well as of the exponential notation....
...Throughout the six surviving books of Arithmetica there is a systematic use of abbreviations for powers of numbers and for relationships and operations. An unknown number is represented by a symbol resembling the Greek letter ζ (perhaps for the last letter of arithmos)....
- You may also want to study the following article in order gain a better understanding of the differences between rhetorical, syncopated, and symbolic algebra: History of algebra.
I hope that this helped. selfwormTalk) 14:39, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Yes, thanks. I do not believe this is a widely known meaning of the term, but rather a technical term with a special meaning in this area, much as the term "field" in algebra has special meaning. Perhaps a link should be provided in the body of the main article. Katzmik 10:24, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
