Talk:The Cartridge Family
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Older comments
People keep adding that the Sky One banning of this episode had something to do with the 1996 Dunblane massacre. I haven't been able to find a source for this, though - the official Sky One statement at the time simply said the episode content was 'too strong'. Besides, Dunblane was over a year and a half ago by then, and by the time it was eventually shown on Sky it was almost ten years ago. It doesn't make sense, anyway - Homer doesn't shoot any kids or anything (or anyone at all). So if you want to add the mention of the Dunblane shootings back in, please add a source. BillyH 14:07, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Quotes
i'm going to delete Willie saying "They call this a soccer riot?" and the Scottish men starting the riot is a reference to soccer hooliganism in Great Britain. because it has no merit- it plays on stereotypes and doesn't say why it makes reference to this. it appears that someone associated football with hooliganism and therefore linked them here with no proof. Jonomacdrones 21:38, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Firearms
more of the firearms to be listed. any more firearms would be appreciated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.236.226.196 (talk) 00:13, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
- No, I don't think it would be. Wikipedia is not a place for information, and the guns in the gunshop are too trivial, and not what the episode is well known for. TheBlazikenMaster 00:22, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] GA review
- "This was the first episode to be executively produced by Mike Scully."
- Already was done.
- I mean, executively is the wrong word. "Executive produced" is proper grammar. Alientraveller 15:55, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
- Already was done.
- Swartzwelder on the commentary is more relevant to his article.
Alientraveller 15:12, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Pass. Alientraveller 16:14, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] GA Sweeps (Pass)
This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, MASEM 23:51, 20 December 2007 (UTC)