Talk:The Brig

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Brig article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	Television Portal This article is part of WikiProject Television, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to television programs and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
Assessment comments This article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

This page falls within the scope of the Lost WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia articles relating to the 2004–2010 ABC television series Lost. Information on future episodes needs to follow the policy regarding sources.

Does anybody actually know if this is a Jack centric episode? The second citation in the article does certainly not lead to a reputable source. It would make far more sense if this was a Locke centric episode. Can anybody find an official source on whose flashback this will be, or at least a point in the right direction? Also, I have seen every episode of season 3, and not once has anybody ever stated who or what The Brig is. If nobody contradicts all this, then I will start to make edits in 48 hours. Thanks --Pinknoise 15:23, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

• It was speculated to be a Jack flashback but there are also reports that it will not be a Jack centric episode. TV.com can be edited by anyone so therefore is not a reputable source. The centric of this episode is not even confirmed by SpoilerFix.com. The flashback character will become a lot more apparent and official when the press release for this episode is released on Monday 16 April. Matt

• • It now looks apparent that this episode may not have a flashback, however this has not yet been confirmed by any official sources Matt 22:10, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

• • • It does seem like this will be a no flashback episode and taht the finale will be Jack centric 172.207.194.164 14:54, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

"==Trivia==

• A brig is a military prison that is on a ship or navy base." adds nothing to the artivcle(Black Dalek 11:19, 17 April 2007 (UTC)).

Contents 1 Ideas? 2 Is Nikki a Main Character or Not? 3 Some Additions and Modifications 4 Fair use rationale for Image:Naomi and Desmond.png

[edit] Ideas?

Did Sawyer ever find the the 'original' Sawyer? I bet that Anthony Cooper is the true 'Sawyer'.

 me too--70.189.175.84 05:48, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

• It seems that that would make a lot of sense, seeing as how if Anthony Cooper=the original Sawyer, then the whole Locke and Sawyer have a common enemy thing makes sense.

[edit] Is Nikki a Main Character or Not?

The debate was dead, but it has risen from the grave! Bring your garlic and wooden stakes to Talk:Nikki Fernandez! 63.215.29.15 23:57, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Some Additions and Modifications

Added image to article, please leave it there or suggest/upload a better one. Also moved the article to The Brig (Lost) as to keep with the correct format for lost episodes. Other than that :D R0ck1t 15:47, 3 May 2007 (UTC) °!°

We don't disambiguate individual episode articles unless it's necessary. Since there is no other article simply titled The Brig "(Lost)" isn't needed. - DocNox 20:17, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Sorry bout that just the last lad of episodes are in the "Episode Title" (Lost) format but probably for the reason you stated, shame there can't be some continuity though. R0ck1t 23:38, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Naomi and Desmond.png

Image:Naomi and Desmond.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 00:30, 7 November 2007 (UTC)