Talk:The Boy with the Thorn in His Side

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Č==Song vs Book==

I will admit to being kind of unfamiliar with Wikipedia, but surely the song (by The Smiths) should take precedence over the book? Or someone should make this a disambiguation page?

I'd be inclined to agree with that. Also, Amazon lists a 2001 book with this title, by a Keith Fleming. And are the two long, prosaic paragraphs, the blurb from the back of the book? Gregg 15:04, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Article Content

Ugh, this entry is written like a commercial for the book. lame!

Agreed, that there should be a disambiguation page if this page continues to exist. Also the two main paragraphs describing the book are direct copies of the description of the book on this website: www.clandestineindustries.com , which I believe is owned by Peter Wentz, the author of the book. This should probably be deleted, I presume.

My word... Hunter86

I tried to fix up the page, or at least get rid of the straight copy of the original summary. The overview needs some working on, but that's what I've got. dna42zz9

Excuse me, but I don't see what Pete Wentz's nude photos have to do with the actual book. Leave that to his personal article.dna42zz9

I LOVE PETE AND APTRICK AND WANT 2 READ THIS BOOK !!!

[edit] edit

Deleted "Pete WEntz Is FREakIin Hot!!!!=] yes yes we all know". Unless he wrote the book on his chiseled abs or used ink from the neverending oceans that are his eyes, I fail to see how it's relevant. Drown the city 04:22, 19 October 2007 (UTC)