Talk:The Assault on Reason
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate, you can edit the article. You can discuss the Project at its talk page. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at in the comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
 Archives |
[edit] Removing Reason (magazine)
User:The Enlightened has been removing [1] [2] the review by this periodical from the article, citing that it is not notable enough to be mentioned here. I would say that if it's notable enough to have an article, it's plenty notable to be mentioned here. The magazine has a circulation of around 60,000 and has been named among the U.S.'s top 50 magazines. This sounds fine to me, and I would ask other editors' opinions on whether it deserves inclusion or not. GlassCobra (talk • contribs) 21:40, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
-
- One publication (i.e. the Chicago Tribune) named Reason among the US's 50 best magazines, noting that it has a circulation of around 40,000[3]. I do not feel strongly whether the review should be included or not. 138.192.140.22 19:35, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Misprint?
"for being so complacent in the process". Does the article mean that, or does it mean 'complicit'? Generally if you are 'complacent' you are not in the process. 199.71.183.2 14:10, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
