From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate, you can edit the article. You can discuss the Project at its talk page. |
??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary at in the comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
[edit] User:Kitrus's edits
Kitrus, can you explain why you are replacing properly sourced criticism with unsourced claims such as "The book is widely dismissed as being essentialist, reductionist, and unscientific"? This, of course, violates WP:V, WP:NPOV, and WP:NOR. Jayjg (talk) 15:44, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- The Boston Globe article verifies this repeatedly. Read it.--Kitrus 06:24, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- I've read it, and it does not say that. In fact, it uses none of those words. Please quote the sentences in question that you think do say that. Jayjg (talk) 13:33, 27 June 2007 (UTC)