Talk:The Alamo (1960 film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
???
This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

[edit] More Movie Errors

  • In One TV syndicated version of the Movie, Bowie and Crockett discovered a storeroom of rifles and gunpowder; part of this scene which also has Bowie and Crockett having to kill a double dealing swindler who tries to kill them is edited out.
  • In the movie Crockett nearly romances a Spanish Woman who was saved by Crockett from the swindler; in fact Crockett was still married!
  • LAstly the evening before the Alamo falls, Santa Anna orders an attack on the Alamo which results in 50 Alamo casualites; in fact prior to the Alamo's fall there was only one Texas casualty-one man wounded in the foot!
With all these errors (including the errors I helped list in the article), it's no wonder the film was largely ignored by the Academy! --- JS, 70.129.41.10 18:40, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

I very much doubt that the Academy much cared about the real and imagined historical inaccuracies of the movie. Many a historical travesty has won awards from the Academy. The "Historical Inaccuracies" section seems to have become a "Let's Dump of This Movie" section; so much so that the article is endanger of losing a neutral point of view. Is it really an 'inaccuracy' that a 3 hour movie doesn't devote half its running time to the final battle? Is this movie really the worst offender in this regard of the five other Alamo movies that have Wiki articles? (Note that NONE of these articles have an 'Inaccuracies' section.) Perhaps someone should start a section of "Historical Accuracies" for balance? Cdixon 19:23, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I pretty much started the Inaccuracies section any number of months back. I was just trying to point out a few things. Oh, well... at least it's been given better balance. — Cinemaniac (talk) 02:31, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] over emphasis on accuracy

Since this is a film that is not meant to be a documentary, there seems to be way to much focus on it historical accuracy. Also, some of the statements about history go against other wikipedia articles on the subject. Rds865 (talk) 23:15, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:259192.1020.A.jpg

Image:259192.1020.A.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:07, 12 February 2008 (UTC)