Talk:The 1 Second Film

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article was nominated for deletion on 20 January 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

	Film Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Future This article has been rated as Future-Class on the quality scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the priority scale.
Editing Guidelines Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article: If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film) For more information see: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references. Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film.
Additional Information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no

Contents 1 Kiefer's Ear 2 Question 3 imdb has removed the credits 4 65mm film??? 5 Kiefer Sutherland's check

[edit] Kiefer's Ear

It would appear they photoshopped the cigarette out of Kiefer's ear! Is this at all notable? Maybe trivia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.5.233.114 (talk) 04:55, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

They also "photoshopped" out Samuel L. Jackson's name and his daughter's face. Where Jackson's name should have been, Keifer's name is instead. Hell, Christina Ricci isn't even shown on the poster and her name is in big bold letters at the top. I'll let you draw your own conclusions about this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.4.23.217 (talk) 02:22, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Question

When will the ability to purchase a credit end? -Litefantastic 18:03, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] imdb has removed the credits

I don't know their reasoning, but all of the credits have been removed. That needs to be addressed in this article. User:Zoe|^(talk) 23:30, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

No they haven't. You just have to click on "full cast and crew". -- Kicking222 00:50, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Isn't that odd? They weren't there earlier today, but now they are. User:Zoe|^(talk) 02:30, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

The list of producers have been removed from imdb. They have been replaced by a "Producers of the 1 Second Film" credit, which reads "This name represents the producers of The 1 Second Film (2008) since the list is too large and time consuming to represent fully here, sorry. Please visit the official site for the complete updated list.".--SeizureDog 16:00, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

I'm not sure where one could find an official reference for this, but there was a LOT of controversy (including threats of lawsuits) when IMDB removed individual credits for this movie. This is because the people running the project had used the ability to add your profile to imdb.com as a selling point to get people to become a "producer" for the film. To be specific, imdb.com doesn't allow one to have an entry unless one has verifiable professional credits to one's name. So they were appealing to thousands of wanna-be directors, actors, etc... to give money to the project with the incentive that they could add their name to imdb.com after donating. Then when imdb.com took this away, thousands of people demanded their money back because they no longer had what they were promised. TheGoonSquad (talk) 01:11, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

WOW, according to the 1secondblog, the actual ENTRY for the film is now gone from IMDB. And I searched for it, even based on the director's name -- nowhere to be found. WTF!? 199.214.26.226 (talk) 21:22, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 65mm film???

The second paragraph says that it is filmed in 65mm, the final paragraph says it is shown in 70mm as does the official website... I dont understand filming well, but I assume this is a mistake?

• It's the same thing, more or less. See 70 mm film. --Metropolitan90 19:16, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Kiefer Sutherland's check

Take a closer look at his check, note the routing numbers are 24 24 24..., certainly a reference to his role as Jack Bauer on the television program "24." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.49.22.45 (talk) 21:30, 24 March 2008 (UTC)