User talk:Thanissaro

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Thanissaro, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

Contents

[edit] Notability of Thongsuk Samdaengpan

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Thongsuk Samdaengpan, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Thongsuk Samdaengpan seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Thongsuk Samdaengpan, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 23:02, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] What is Editorial Policy on Bad External Links?

If a Wikipedia entry bases its citations on external links which have since become defunct, how should a Wikipedian improve the page in the case

  • that equivalent citation can be linked from another source
  • that no equivalent citation is available
The guidelines for what to do when a reference link goes dead are here. Regards, Gr1st (talk) 11:30, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for Magha Puja article!

Hi Thanissaro - just wanted to thank you for creating the Magha Puja article. Good job! Happy Uposatha day! Larry Rosenfeld (talk) 15:13, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Buddhism in the Netherlands

Updated DYK query On 23 February 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Buddhism in the Netherlands, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Victuallers (talk) 14:33, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Book?

Are you the same Thanissaro who appears as the 3rd author in the 5th edition of Robinson et al, Buddhist Religions? Peter jackson (talk) 11:37, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Is this really a case of a copyright infringement?

{{helpme}} There is a user who persistently removes a link to a news article claiming it is a copyright infringement. The user in question does not discuss changes, but just deletes things, with a comment in the edit summary. The edit in question is this one [1]. Am I missing something? Is this criticism justified? If it is not justified and the user in general continues with this behaviour, is there something that can be done about it? Thanissaro (talk) 21:19, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Links can't be copyright violation. However, in this case, the links that were removed were all spam anyway, so all well and good that they're gone. KTC (talk) 21:27, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, those weren't spam links. I made a mistake like my ad-blocker because of the word 'advert' in the URL. What were deleted there were links under the references section. That come under Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Those images are hosted on a geocities site, which mean it normally wouldn't pass the reliable criteria. However, (some of) it looks like newspaper clippings to me, with me not being able to understand what it say, and hence where it came from, I can't comment whether it constituents reliable sources. (Of course, I'm completely ignoring whether the linked to website are hosting those images legally...) KTC (talk) 03:15, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
I presume the bit of the article where you're using those articles as references already provide that summary. Otherwise yes, citing giving the date/newspaper title etc. using {{Cite news}} would be the way to go, all assuming the newspaper pass as reliable sources. KTC (talk) 07:36, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] เวลาอังกฤษUTC+0

นี่คือ เวลาอังกฤษ 17:02 + ไปอีก 7 ชั่วโมงเป็นเวลาไทย