From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I'm Thanos6. Says it all, really. Virulent opponent of the "notability" requirement; I feel that anything that can be verified and proven is worth keeping. I feel NOTHING that can meet those criteria should EVER be deleted, no matter how minor or alledgedly "trivial"; obviously someone doesn't think it's trivial or they wouldn't have added it. The deletionists are no different than the fanatics who torched the Library of Alexandria, which is exactly what Wikipedia should be.
[edit] The Fun Destroyers
The Fun Destroyers are the rot that is slowly eating away at Wikipedia. If something doesn't satisfy their small-minded, tunnelvision version of "notability," then like mindless, shrieking harpies, they fall upon it with cries of "cruft" and "trivia" and "non-notable" and get it deleted, sucking much enjoyment out of Wikipedia for everyone else. Well, no more, I say. We must stand up to the Fun Destroyers and keep this site worth coming to!
[edit] List of Fun Destroyers
For easy reference, so you can know if you're facing an editor who has a simple, easy to resolve disagreement, or if you're facing one of THEM.
This list is incomplete.
User:Sesshomaru
User:Soleil
User:Otto4711
User:Judgesurreal777
User:Kww
User:Anetode
User:Black_Kite
User:Lord_Pistachio
User:David_Fuchs
[edit] Notability must be destroyed
More than any other single factor, it is the Notability guideline that is holding Wikipedia back from achieving true greatness and transcending all previous collections of information. This rule must be destroyed!
[edit] Truten
Trunks Briefs and Son Goten, best friends, lovers, and one of the greatest fictional couples of all time. If you disagree, go the hell away and never, ever, talk to me or touch this page.
/archive
 |
This user is interested in Utilitarianism, the belief that a moral action is one which increases the total happiness of humanity. |
