Talk:Thallus (historian)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I removed the line "On the other hand, if the fragment is taken at face value, it provides interesting confirmation of the existence of Jesus and the historicity of his crucifixion from a non-Christian first-century historian" from the Early Christian Use section, simply because it's wrong. It does not do this in any way, and this line does not contribute to the article as a whole. Hierophantasmagoria (talk) 08:01, 9 February 2008 (UTC)