Talk:Texian Army
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
The article on Texian Army is supported by the WikiProject on Football, which is an attempt to improve the quality and coverage of Association football related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page; if you have any questions about the project or the article ratings below, please consult the FAQ. |
|---|---|
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
This article is supported by the USA and Canada task force. |
[edit] Relevant/Notable/Important?
Is this page even notable? How is a fan club worthy of an encyclopedia entry, especially a MLS fan club? MLS fans are so small in number in America and the fan clubs are an even smaller fraction of that group.130.127.3.249 (talk) 18:37, 29 February 2008 (UTC)JML
You seem to be on a crusade about this issue given you have put this exact same message on other MLS fan clubs, and you are coming up with unsourced criticism. Where are your sources to confirm that MLS fans are numerically small in the USA and that the fan groups are even smaller? The MLS gets decent enough crowds as has been pointed out to you on one of the other articles talk pages where you left this exact same message as the average attendances in the MLS is higher than numerous other countries more known for football. Besides which it is simpy what is notable and not what is notable in the USA. And to answer your question the article is notable.♦Tangerines♦·Talk 18:53, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- I refer to the ESPN attendance pages and point out MLS' poor television ratings and lack of profits. The fact that fan clubs are a smaller percentage of the fanbases is obvious, as they occupy one section whereas every other section is filled with non-fan club fans.
