User talk:Terrace4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi! welcome to Wikipedia!

Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. Be bold in editing pages. Here are some links that you might find useful:

I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. Drop us a note at Wikipedia:New user log.

-- utcursch | talk to me

Contents

[edit] Nominations

Hi, I think most of those articles have been nominated, and have gone away. If you want to nominate articles just attach a {{delete}}-tag on them and they will be nominated and hopefully go away quickly. Sjakkalle 12:37, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Well, I just nominated them, only admins can delete. Sjakkalle 12:46, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion

Hi, Terrace4!

Please read Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion. It seems that you have wrongly nominated some articles for speedy deletion (I commented about that on Wikipedia:Speedy deletions). Please keep these criteria in mind in the future. Paranoid 23:51, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Salang Tunnel fire

I'd much prefer to leave the article on Salang tunnel fire marked as a stub. There is undoubtedly more information out there, but without decent access to Red Army records, we can't claim that Wikipedia knows all - if we remove the stub mark without adding more certain information to the sketchy details that I've assembled, we run the risk of marking as "fact" things which I firmly believe are speculation.

Compare the relative shakiness of my (web) sources on Salang with the more solid references I've assembled on Kings Cross fire, Oxford Circus fire, Summit tunnel fire, Caldecott Tunnel fire and Holland Tunnel fire. Many of those references are peer-reviewed journal articles, Her Majesty's Railway Inspectorate reports, Health & Safety Executive reports etc. We don't have anything nearly as authoritative on the Salang tunnel fire.

If you do manage to find any more information on Salang tunnel fire, please add it: in the absence of any change, I'll re-instate the stub mark in a month or so.

Notwithstanding this, which I hope you'll intepret as the mildest of reproofs, Welcome to Wikipedia - and please, continue to be Bold in your Edits!

Ecb 16:13, May 1, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Notenglish tag

Please use {{notenglish}} tags on articles in foreign languages. They are not automatically candidates for speedy deletion. Kappa 23:58, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Mike Merritt

Sorry yeah, it was from the Mike Merritt website. I was in the process of putting it in 3rd person, but you are right.

[edit] Copyvois

You need to delete the copyviod material when you put a copy vio on an article. I have done it for you this time, --SqueakBox 03:55, May 18, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] EGFR

Thanks for your help with this article stub -- much appreciated! Jbetak 07:30, 18 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Re:Zonisamide

You're welcome.

[edit] PMID & Quinupristin-dalfopristin

Re: Quinupristin-dalfopristin
If you remove the ":" between "PMID" and the PMID number wikipedia automatically generates a link to PubMed.

PMID: 1234567 vs PMID 1234567

Keep-up the good work! Nephron 22:22, 7 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Request for edit summary

Hi. I am a bot, and I am writing to you with a request. I would like to ask you, if possible, to use edit summaries a bit more often when you contribute. The reason an edit summary is important is because it allows your fellow contributors to understand what you changed; you can think of it as the "Subject:" line in an email. For your information, your current edit summary usage is 7% for major edits and 39% for minor edits. (Based on the last 150 major and 150 minor edits outside the Wikipedia, User, Image, and all Talk namespaces.)

This is just a suggestion, and I hope that I did not appear inpolite. You do not need to reply to this message, but if you would like to give me feedback, you can do so at the feedback page. Thank you, and happy edits, Mathbot 04:31, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Talk:Streetfighter

please have a look. ++Scooterman 15:49, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

==Please Use Edit Summaries==

Hello. Please remember to always provide an edit summary. Thanks and happy editing.

Zpb52 12:13, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hi Doc!

Hi, welcome to Wikipedia and enjoy. If you're interested in medicine-related articles, we have a place where the medically minded people hang out: WikiProject "Clinical Medicine". You are invited to join. Nephron  T|C 21:48, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Please watch

Please watch amygdala. Thank you. Koalabyte 02:15, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Spam in Loestrin

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Loestrin, by Absurdist (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Loestrin is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Loestrin, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:41, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Cadderly Bonaduce

An article that you have been involved in editing, Cadderly Bonaduce, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cadderly Bonaduce. Thank you.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 09:10, 11 November 2007 (UTC)