Talk:Terrorist (novel)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate, you can edit the article. You can discuss the Project at its talk page. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary at in the comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions. | ||
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class. | ||
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
[edit] Someone?
Someone finish the summary. I got it started.
[edit] Review
Why is the only cited review of Terrorist by the World Socialists? In reading it, it seems, not unnaturally, incredibly biased, and speaks more to their evaluation of society than the book itself. -PeterVerkhovensky
- I also think the review has a clear (distracting and marginally irrelevant) political slant. On the other hand, it has the advantage of being thorough and I thought it did a remarkably effective job of pointing out some serious literary blemishes in Updike's book.
- In the meanwhile a user has added a pointer to a review from the New York Times, so that the review you are talking about no longer stands alone. Are you satisfied with the situation? What would you think of adding further citations, as opposed to removing those already there?
--Philopedia 17:00, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Terrorist 300.jpg
Image:Terrorist 300.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 09:35, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
