Talk:Terik

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article Terik has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
February 22, 2006 Good article nominee Listed
Zuni girl; photograph by Edward S. Curtis, 1903 This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.
NB: Assessment ratings and other indicators given below are used by the Project in prioritizing and managing its workload.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the Project's quality scale.
High This article has been rated as high-importance on the Project's importance scale.
After rating the article, please provide a short summary on the article's ratings summary page to explain your ratings and/or identify the strengths and weaknesses.
  This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Endangered languages, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles related to Endangered languages. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.

[edit] Failed GA

Sorry, I just don't think there's enough here to make this a Good Article. Keep at it, though! —BorgHunter ubx (talk) 16:13, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Have to say I disagree with that and think it looks perfect for a good article. Worldtraveller 16:32, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
...so I've done what the tag said and made it a GA. Worldtraveller 16:34, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
Ah, I just started thinking that GA and these kind of articles are simply incompatible (there isn't much to expand when you've pretty much exhausted all published sources). — mark 16:45, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
They're exactly the kind of article I had in mind when I started the GA page! Short but comprehensive and excellent encyclopaedic content. Worldtraveller 16:52, 22 February 2006 (UTC)