Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 February 9

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:13, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Template:Nevermind (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

I am renominating this template for deletion as six of the orginal 13 articles are now exsistent and there is no need for a navbox to link a few songs and the singles when in is filled with non-linking text. Your opinions please. — Thanks for reading, ThunderMaster ^UTC 13:54, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

• Comment Previous discussion - Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 November_9#Template:Nevermind - JPG-GR (talk) 19:46, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep, per previous discussion. Happy‑melon 22:01, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete There was a discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Alternative music about redirecting pages for songs there isn't enough reference material to write full articles about. As a result over half of the song pages have been redirected to Nevermind, making the template useless now. WesleyDodds (talk) 01:19, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
  • The pages linked to from this template range from start-class to Featured Article, and none of them are redirects. I'm not sure I follow this argument. Happy‑melon 22:21, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
    • I don't understand your counterargument. WesleyDodds (talk) 00:29, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
      • Neither do I. The ones in black on the templates are the ones that used to exist as articles but were made into redirects. Therefore the template is not useful (the In Utero template went through TfD and was deleted). Thanks for reading, ThunderMaster ^UTC 08:40, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep-Five of the entires have been de-linked, but there's still quite a few (8) extant as articles, so utility as a navigational tool still exists.--Fyre2387 ^{(talk • contribs)} 23:38, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Even if all of the songs on an album have an article, this template is still redundant to {{Extra tracklisting}} in the song/single infobox. That template also means that we won't be crowded with track listing templates for each of these albums. --Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 02:54, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per Brant Luke Zorn. NSR77 ^T_C 23:18, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per Brant Like Zorn too. Armando.O ^{talk ● Ev ● 3K} 22:26, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.