Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 September 21
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] September 21
[edit] Template:Worldwide Hazardous Material Handling
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. — Malcolm (talk) 01:59, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Unused and unlikely to be used. --Carnildo 21:13, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, far too large to be helpful in an article, unused. Hersfold (t/a/c) 04:20, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit] Template:ARC stadia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. — Malcolm (talk) 02:00, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Superceded by {{ARC Grounds}}, therefore redundant. — Bob 20:25, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit] Template:South Africa Rugby
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. — Malcolm (talk) 02:01, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Superceded by {{Rugby union in South Africa}}, therefore redundant. — Bob 20:25, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, unused and not needed. CRGreathouse (t | c) 14:56, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit] Template:Currie Cup
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. — Malcolm (talk) 02:03, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Superceded by {{Rugby union in South Africa}}, therefore redundant. — Bob 20:25, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, unused and not needed. CRGreathouse (t | c) 14:56, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit] Template:Eng rugby prem
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. — Malcolm (talk) 02:03, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Superceded by {{Rugby union in England}}, therefore redundant. — Bob 20:25, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, unused and not needed. CRGreathouse (t | c) 14:56, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit] Template:French Rugby links
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. — Malcolm (talk) 02:06, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Superceded by {{Rugby union in France}}, therefore redundant. — Bob 20:25, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, unused and not needed. CRGreathouse (t | c) 14:56, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit] Template:Italian Rugby links
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. — Malcolm (talk) 02:06, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Superceded by {{Rugby union in Italy}}, therefore redundant. — Bob 20:25, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, unused and not needed. CRGreathouse (t | c) 14:56, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit] Template:Month 28 Fr etc
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. — Malcolm (talk) 02:10, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
- Template:Month 28 Fr (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Template:Month 28 Mo (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Template:Month 28 Sa (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Template:Month 28 Su (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Template:Month 28 Th (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Template:Month 28 Tu (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Template:Month 28 We (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Template:Month 29 Fr (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Template:Month 29 Mo (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Template:Month 29 Sa (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Template:Month 29 Su (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Template:Month 29 Th (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Template:Month 29 Tu (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Template:Month 29 We (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Template:Month 30 Fr (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Template:Month 30 Mo (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Template:Month 30 Sa (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Template:Month 30 Su (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Template:Month 30 Th (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Template:Month 30 Tu (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Template:Month 30 We (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Template:Month 31 Fr (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Template:Month 31 Mo (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Template:Month 31 Sa (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Template:Month 31 Su (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Template:Month 31 Th (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Template:Month 31 Tu (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Template:Month 31 We (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - two months ago I suggested to delete Template:MonthR 28 Fr and 27 other templates (note the additional R in the name). They had been replaced by Template:Month3. So I was rather suprised to discover these. AFAI can see they do exactly the same, and they aren't used. HandigeHarry 21:04, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as redundant. CRGreathouse (t | c) 14:57, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit] Template:Month
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. IronGargoyle 05:54, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
- Template:Month (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - this one will be unused when the previous ones are deleted. HandigeHarry 21:12, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. CRGreathouse (t | c) 14:57, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit] Template:SANZAR links
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. IronGargoyle 05:56, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Superceded by {{Tri Nations}} and {{Super Rugby}}, therefore redundant. — Bob 20:25, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, redundant. CRGreathouse (t | c) 14:58, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit] Template:Russian launch vehicles
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus. IronGargoyle 06:01, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Redundant to Template:ELVs (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs). — GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 21:34, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep for now. The two templates aren't really redundant, which would imply that the {{ELVs}} template is a complete substitute for the {{Russian launch vehicles}} template. Overlooking the obvious and easy-to-fix fact that {{Russian launch vehicles}} contains vehicles that are not included in {{ELVs}}, the problem is that {{ELVs}} is a mishmash of a whole bunch of rocket names that casual users like me aren't familiar with. Frankly, if I was only interested in reading about Russian/Soviet rockets (an extremely reasonable possibility), using {{ELVs}} as a navbox would be frustrating to me, since I'd have to wade through American, Chinese, etc. rockets to get what I want. However, I mentioned "for now" because if {{ELVs}} were to be further segregated into ELV's by nationality (such as breaking the list into columns by nationality, I'd view the {{Russian launch vehicles}} template as truly redundant and would support deletion. Neil916 (Talk) 06:20, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Malcolm (talk) 20:19, 21 September 2007 (UTC) - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit] Template:Cite refs
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. WoohookittyWoohoo! 05:02, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Needless to say, the only difference between this template and the common {{Fact}} is that it's hideous and unprofessional. A message like this would best be inserted as a hidden comment. . Chris B • talk 19:52, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- Redirect to {{Fact}}} --Farix (Talk) 20:48, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; it's hideous. CRGreathouse (t | c) 00:43, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - needless duplication of {{who}} and {{fact}} or {{cn}}--Cailil talk 14:56, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, leave a redirect to {{fact}} (would be useful). Neil ム 11:39, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - unused. --Sigma 7 11:59, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit] Template:Disputed template
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Unused and extremely confusing. WoohookittyWoohoo! 05:14, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
There is no reason for this template. Templates don't exist as guidelines or policy, and even if they did, {{disputedtag}} works just as well. — The Evil Spartan 17:59, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- I was unaware of this template, but I could see a couple of uses for it if it survives this TfD. There are a few templates which masquerade as policy. If we really needed the disc space, the disputed policy tag would be fine, but where is the harm in having a more precise tag? However, I don't feel strongly either way. --Kevin Murray 19:34, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as redundant and somewhat confusing. CRGreathouse (t | c) 00:46, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit] Template:Metra Line Index
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. IronGargoyle 05:59, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
This template was essentially duplicating the navbox {{Metra Lines}}. I have now merged the two of them so there is no need for them both. — Jeremy (talk) 03:18, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. CRGreathouse (t | c) 14:58, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
