Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 August 28

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete per CSD G7 (author request). — Black Falcon ^(Talk) 23:59, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Template:Doctor Who example (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

No longer relevant. Probally shouldn't have created it in the first place, but it's too late now. StuartDD ( t • c ) 22:28, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

• Comment Tagged with {{db-author}} for speedy deletion. --Farix (Talk) 23:43, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. IronGargoyle 00:32, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Template:Cartoon Network-Picture (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Orphan template, incomplete and of no use to project which owns it.. treelo _talk 21:43, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete If the respective WikiProject wishes to tag images with a project banner, then they should adapt their main banner to the task instead of creating a separate name space specific banner. --Farix (Talk) 23:41, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete, per several recent MFDs/DRVs on BJAODN. >Radiant< 07:51, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Template:Bjaodn-move (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Useless template since BJAODN is no longer adding new material. — Moe ε 21:20, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete Circeus 04:18, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Template:Sakura Taisen character info (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Used only once, and to poor effect. Template contains a lot of trivia that doesn't add incite into the character and IMO the template is constructed poorly. Superseded by Template:Infobox animanga character. Farix (Talk) 20:30, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. IronGargoyle 00:34, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Template:MajorRevision (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

This is an unused disclaimer template that states: "Content on this page is incomplete, and may contain omissions or inaccuracies." In addition to the fact that this disclaimer applies to all articles (or because of it), it is redundant to Wikipedia:General disclaimer. Delete. Black Falcon ^(Talk) 19:46, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete The template was suppose to receive a revision per its previous TfD discussion over a year ago. However, that revision never occurred. The template is in violation of WP:NDA and there doesn't appear to be a real need for it. --Farix (Talk) 21:17, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. IronGargoyle 00:45, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Template:Carnivàle (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Delete - about half of the entries redirect to segments of the same article and the other related articles are already strongly interlinked through text. Template serves little or no navigational function. Otto4711 18:56, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

• Comment as template creator. At the time of the del nom, the template linked to 4 distinct subpages plus the main page, but I've added two more links to articles for the two main characters of the show now. The reason for that half of the entries redirect to segments of the same article is that I chose to not follow the usual procedure to create stubs for by-themself-not-hugely-notable fictional topics and rather included all in one main fiction article. Still, the template gives an IMO easy navigable overview over the Carnivàle topics that have wikipedia coverage, as e.g. even I as the current main contributer to the Carnivàle pages lost track what articles (or sections) existed and under what name. I found this template very useful in this matter but I can see how it can give the opposite impression. I abstain from a vote. – sgeureka ^t•c 00:26, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
  • The structure of Carnivàle-related articles is currently being reworked (finished in a few hours maximum), making it no longer necessary to have a template. It doesn't really matter if this template is kept or deleted, IMO, although I think deletion makes more sense now. – sgeureka ^t•c 08:30, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
    • On third thought, just delete it. I've already removed it from the Carnivàle pages. (This basically equals {{db-author}}, but I don't know if speedy tags can also apply to templates.) – sgeureka ^t•c 10:48, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. IronGargoyle 00:36, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Template:Comedy Central Roast (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

• Delete - the stub articles on the various roasts have been merged and redirected to the main article so there's basically nothing to navigate. — Otto4711 16:30, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - I agree with Otto4711. Pointless. The link to Comedy Central and Comedy Roast can be added to the article. You know what, I'll do it. BioYu-Gi! 20:34, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty^Woohoo! 10:49, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Template:QuoteScholar (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Template no longer needed as the same can be achieved using {{cquote}} with bgcolor parameter. All articles have been updated to use cquote.. → AA ^(talk) — 14:32, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as redundant. —Crazytales (t.) 14:46, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as above. -- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 14:48, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete redunednt, and cquote takes up less writing. Might be best to make it a redirect so as to not interrupt the usage of the template within articles.--Sefringle^Talk 04:54, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. I don't see a need to redirect, considering that the template is orphaned. — Black Falcon ^(Talk) 05:00, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy deleted by Crazytales. — Gavia immer (talk) 19:02, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Template:Indian National Rally driver (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Seems to be a test edit. Has never had any template content and no one has edited it since its creation. Not used and not needed (we have a rally driver infobox).. Adrian M. H. 10:57, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

• Speedied as test page. —Crazytales (t.) 14:22, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Yannismarou 17:29, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Template:Hogwarts Express article (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

It seems silly to have a route diagram template for a fictional line with no stops. Max Talk (+) 00:57, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete with a magic wand Who thinks up such weird templates? Great idea, wrong wiki. Shalom ^Hello 03:17, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - indeed, wrong wiki. -- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 06:31, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
• Avada Kedavra, pretty much in-universe fancruft. —Crazytales (t.) 14:21, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - pure fancruft, adds nothing to any articles. I think this is an obvious delete. Nihiltres^(t.l) 16:12, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
• But Subst. Why not? It's only used in one article, and is only conceivable in two others. In fact, I'll go do that. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 13:08, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
• Perhaps. But considering the opening argument, fictional railways (such as Sodor & Mainland Railway have diagrams, as do lines with no stops: Waterloo & City Line. I don't think that's the point here. Spike iron 23:03, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
  • They have maps, which also give geographical information as well as stop information. If there was a free map of the Hogwarts Express, maybe, but using a route diagram for this is pointless in my opinion.--Max Talk (+) 01:37, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.