User talk:Temurjin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Temurjin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! .**My Cat inn @ (talk)** 04:50, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Mongolian tugrug

Thank you for the info. I still need some info on the meaning and the origin of the "mongo" name. Timur lenk 08:17, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

In addition to being 1/100 of tugrug, "mungu" means "money" and also "silver". My guess is that "silver" is the original meaning. Temur 23:04, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Romanisation of Mongolian

Hi, I noticed that you're a native speaker of Mongolian. I thought you might be interested in the conversation ongoing at Wikipedia talk:Romanisation of Mongolian. Cheers, Nat Krause(Talk!·What have I done?) 19:16, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Smile


Gantuya eng 09:40, 21 September 2007 (UTC) has smiled at you! Hopefully this one has made your day better. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

[edit] WProject Relativity

Hi there. Thanks for joining Wikipedia:WikiProject Relativity! It's always a struggle to get editors to join such a project. Enjoy. :)MP (talk•contribs) 08:30, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Central Asia

Hi - based on your interests on your userpage, I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Central Asia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aelfthrytha (talk • contribs) 03:40, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] ==Smile==

[edit] Smile


Gantuya eng (talk) 15:59, 29 December 2007 (UTC) has smiled at you! Hopefully this one has made your day better. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

[edit] Orlicz space

That was a good observation on your part. The embedding theorem described in the article doesn't really belong under the heading of Orlicz-Sobolev spaces. Hopefully someone will eventually write a section on those, or perhaps a separate article. At this point I don't know much about them myself beyond the (obvious) definition. Perturbationist (talk) 02:18, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mongolia work group

Hi, I'd like to invite you to the Mongolia work group of the WikiProject Central Asia. You're welcome to add that page to your watchlist and participate in discussions there. So far, many general discussions about topics related to Mongolia have been discussed on individual user's talk pages, away from the attention of a wider audience. I hope that a centralized talk page will make communication between all of us easier. If a question doesn't primarily concern just one specific user, then the work group is probably the right place to ask it. See you there! --Latebird (talk) 06:09, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Template:User RUG

A tag has been placed on Template:User RUG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 19:24, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Ok. Thanks for catching that. That seems to be a mistake I forgot about. Temur (talk) 01:14, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Peer review idea

Hi, I have made a proposal that no peer review request be archived without some response. To aid in this, there is a new list of PR requests at least one week old that have had no repsonses beyond a semi-automated peer review. This list is at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog.

There are just over 100 names on the PR volunteers page, so I figure if each of these volunteers reviewed just one or two PR requests without a response from the list each month, it would easily take care of the "no response" backlog (as there have been 2 or 3 such unanswered requests a day on average).

If you would be able to help out with a review or two a month from the "no responses" backlog list that would be great (and much appreciated). Please discuss questions, comments, or ideas at the PR talk page and thanks in advance for your help, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 00:21, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Notability of James A. Isenberg

A tag has been placed on James A. Isenberg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ukexpat (talk) 21:32, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

OK, that works - but we'll need a reference for that 1995 paper, or else the article could probably be nominated for deletion. I've removed the speedy deletion and hangon tags on that basis. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 23:43, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Request for Peer Review help

Thank you for you work as a peer review volunteer. Since March, there has been a concerted effort to make sure all peer review requests get some response. Requests that have gone three days or longer without a substantial response are listed at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog. I have three requests to help this continue.

1) If you are asked to do a peer review, please ask the person who made the request to also do a review, preferably of a request that has not yet had feedback. This is fairly simple, but helps. For example when I review requests on the backlog list, I close with Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, ...

2) While there are several people who help with the backlog, lately I have been doing up to 3 or 4 peer reviews a day and can not keep this up much longer. We need help. Since there are now well over 100 names on the PR volunteers page, if each volunteer reviewed just one PR request without a response from the list each month, it would easily take care of the "no response" backlog. To help spread out the load, I suggest those willing pick a day of the month and do a review that day (for example, my first edit was on the 8th, so I could pick the 8th). Please pick a peer review request with no responses yet, if possible off the backlog list. If you want, leave a note on my talk page as to which day you picked and I will remind you each month.

3) I have made some proposals to add some limits to peer review requests at Wikipedia_talk:Peer_review#Proposed_limits. The idea is to prevent any one user from overly burdening the process. These seem fairly reasonable (one PR request per editor per day, only four total PR requests per editor at a time, PR requests with cleanup banners can be delisted (like GAN quick fail), and wait two weeks to relist a PR request after it is archived), but have gotten no feedback in one week. If you have any thoughts on these, please weigh in.

Thanks again for your help and in advance for any assistance with the backlog. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 21:34, 27 May 2008 (UTC)