User talk:Tdizzlelax13

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Talk:Peru has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. · AndonicO ^Hail! 13:58, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Quiz March 18 2007

A tag has been placed on Quiz March 18 2007 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Redfarmer (talk) 23:24, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Quiz March 18 2007. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Redfarmer (talk) 23:26, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Exegesis, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. скоморохъ 23:28, 18 March 2008 (UTC)