User talk:Tdawe

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page Daniel Jennings. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. NawlinWiki 14:18, 10 May 2007 (UTC)


The article Daniel Jennings has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 14:29, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. - Yamamoto Ichiro (山本一郎)(会話) 14:06, 18 June 2007 (UTC)


Contents

[edit] Speedy deletion of Kurt bambrough

A tag has been placed on Kurt bambrough requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. spryde | talk 14:19, 15 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Speedy deletion of Daniel jennings 8a

A tag has been placed on Daniel jennings 8a requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. spryde | talk 14:20, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Notice

A tag has been placed on 9f, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Storkk (talk) 14:06, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pages you are trying to create

Hello, I notice that you are trying to create many different pages, especially about you or your class at school. Please read our Notability guidelines. Perhaps you are trying to create your user page, and mistakenly putting it into the main article space? As long as you follow the guidelines, you may create your userpage by editing here. Cheers, Storkk (talk) 14:09, 13 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Speedy deletion of George brine

A tag has been placed on George brine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. OnoremDil 14:12, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Please stop

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia you will be blocked. --OnoremDil 14:13, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Final warning

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Onorem, you will be blocked from editing. --OnoremDil 14:18, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Block

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Talk 15:11, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

--Orange Mike | Talk 15:11, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

{{unblock|I have been blocked for a sufficient amount of time, and I have learnt my lesson}}

Are you sure that you're blocked? What's the block message say? PhilKnight (talk) 11:32, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Try to edit a page, such as WP:SAND. If you can edit it, you are not blocked. According to your block log, you were blocked at 15:10, 13 December 2007 by Orangemike with an expiry time of 1 week ‎for "Attempting to harass other users: Harassment of Onorem". Assuming my maths is correct, that block expired over 5 months ago. :-) Stwalkerstertalk ] 12:08, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Block has expired. No unblock necessary - Enjoy editing in a productive manner. Request handled by: UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 12:26, 22 May 2008 (UTC)