Talk:Taste (sociology)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details. | ||||||||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. | ||||||||
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale. | ||||||||
|
|||||||||
Failed vote for deletion can be found at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Bad taste
Contents |
[edit] erm?
It has been proven the Webb Baird has good taste. That is a fact.
To be deleted I guess?
Removed this link to an external humor site [1] - Writtenonsand 22:12, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Critique of Good Taste
A critique of Good Taste in the British context can be found on [2]
[edit] Removed
I removed:
- Paul Graham notes, "I think it's easier to see ugliness than to imagine beauty. The recipe for great work is: very exacting taste."
because I do not see a worldwide perspective, is Paul Graham important in the field of aesthetics? --Jahsonic 08:43, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Move
An admin to move the article to Taste (aesthetics), please. Taste is about aesthetics (not in the sens of « the branch of philosophy »). Sociology is only one of the few disciplines of research on that subject : philosophy, history, cultural studies, psychology...
--Ironie (talk) 01:17, 26 December 2007 (UTC) the french aesthetician of fr:
