User talk:Tarun2k

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi, Welcome to talkpage of Tarun2k

Contents

[edit] Image:Claire Forlani.JPG

Hi did you take this pic?Genisock2 (talk) 14:58, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Oh yes I did. It was at the premier of the movie 'Flashbacks of a Fool' at Empire Theatre, Leicester Square, London, where she was giving autographs to her fans when I took this photo. This is free content that I am posting it on wikipedia. Tarun2k (talk) 14:07, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Constitutional block.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Constitutional block.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers. If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:07, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:07, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

details added Tarun2k (talk) 14:08, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:First Convocation.JPG missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:First Convocation.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers. If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:08, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:08, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

details added Tarun2k (talk) 14:08, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] India quick links

Links for Wikipedians interested in India content

Register: Indian Wikipedians | Network: Noticeboard | Discussionboard Browse: India | Open tasks | Deletions
Contribute content: Collaboration Dashboard - India WikiProject - Wikiportal India - Indian current events - Category adoptions


utcursch | talk 04:02, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: rating articles

Hi there.

Unfortunately, the WikiProject Law Assessment Dept. is undergoing construction, and this will not be complete until sometime in June 2008. I have kept a note of the articles you have mentioned and they will be among the first assessed when the dept. is open and ready.

To your question, an article may be rated by going to the article's talk page, and looking for a banner that states {{WikiProject Law|class=|importance=}}. If it is not there, then you should add that to the talk page and upon saving changes, it should look like this:

⚖
Law Portal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
??? This article has not yet received a quality rating on the assessment scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance assessment on the assessment scale.

You then fill it in with the appropriate class and importance. For example, if an article is a "Start" class article that is of mid importance to the overall project, then you edit the page and put "start" after "class=" and "mid" after "importance=" so that it says {{WikiProject Law|class=start|importance=low}}. Once you've saved changes, it should look like this:

⚖
Law Portal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale.
Mid This article has been assessed as mid-importance on the assessment scale.

Regards,

Ncmvocalist (talk) 13:45, 16 May 2008 (UTC) - WikiProject Law Assessment Dept.

You'd add your name to the 'new members' list (when it is available - after the dept. is fully constructed in June). After gathering sufficient experience, a more experienced member will move your name to the list of the assessment team. For now though, it is a matter of waiting. Ncmvocalist (talk) 15:32, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Possibly unfree Image:Blogger screen.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Blogger screen.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Samuell Lift me up or put me down 04:15, 25 May 2008 (UTC) --Samuell Lift me up or put me down 04:15, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Hi

Hello and thank you for the welcome. I have a definite interest in some of the law articles, though more domestic USA jurisdictions and public international law. I know nothing about the law in India, but drop a line anytime if there's something you would like to discuss or a tidbit you think I may interested in. InMyHumbleOpinion (talk) 02:42, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] DOI bot back online

Hi, thanks for your help munching through the DOI bot backlog! You'll be pleased to hear that I've fixed the bugs (I hope!) and the bot's now back up and running. If you do feel like helping with the backlog some more, it might be worth checking the contributions page to make sure the bot's not currently active. While working on two terminals at once oughtn't to do it any harm, it might confuse things a little, and generates unnecessary server load.

Thanks again,

Smith609 Talk 14:24, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] hi

Hello the SCICase template is modeled on the Infobox style in which many cases of US supreme court are presented in wiki articles, for usage of SCICase template in Indian cases you can look at M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (Oleum Gas Leak Case), Kesavananda Bharati v. The State of Kerala, hope it is useful, incidentally I interned at Law Commission of India, the place is not as organised as it looks from its website ;) LegalEagle (talk) 03:02, 11 June 2008 (UTC)