User talk:Taragreen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Taragreen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  William M. Connolley 20:18, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Pielke

Do you have any connection to Pielke? I draw your attention to: All articles written about yourself, your friends, your company, their business partners or products, or as part of a marketing or promotional campaign, may be deleted without further notice in accordance with our deletion policies. Not the deletion, of course; just that auto-biography (in an extended sense) is frowned on a bit. I do it though William M. Connolley 20:59, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add commercial links or links to your own private websites to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thanks. —Xyrael / 19:27, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Kresleycole.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kresleycole.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:08, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Whatcrazy.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:WHATcrazy.jpg. The copy called Image:WHATcrazy.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 22:15, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Whatcrazy.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Whatcrazy.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Muchness 22:53, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:WHAT LOOKS LIKE CRAZY.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:WHAT LOOKS LIKE CRAZY.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:10, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Lisa Jackson

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lisa Jackson, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Lisa Jackson. Mbisanz (talk) 07:01, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Kresley Cole

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Kresley Cole, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Kresley Cole. Mbisanz (talk) 07:06, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Charlotte Hughes

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Charlotte Hughes, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Charlotte Hughes. Mbisanz (talk) 07:06, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

I removed the tag, she apparently wrote NYT best sellers. You might want to improve the article by adding references and reducing the promotional tone.DGG (talk) 04:56, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
I've just taken another look at that article, and the one on her sister Lisa Jackson. It looks like possibly some parts of the websites may possibly have been copied for both, and you really must do something about it--and quickly. I'll look at it again tomorrow,and will drastically cut the articles if you dont immediately rewrite them. Otherwise they are likely to be quickly deleted altogether. I remind you of WP:COI, and WP:BFAQ. DGG (talk) 05:53, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
so i just went ahead and stubbified the 2 of them. Please add make properly referenced material, not extensive quotations. And fix the list of publications so the award winning books dont get mentioned twice. DGG (talk) 06:39, 29 December 2007 (UTC)