Talk:Taoist Tai Chi Society

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Critcism

This article seems to recite the Taoist Tai Chi Society's claims without any rebuttal or criticism, which is odd considering the low esteem with which it is generally held in the martial arts community. (RookZERO 05:03, 26 March 2007 (UTC))

The aim is to make the article align with a NPOV, not to present any possible criticism of the Society. What criticism would you include? the matter of the volunteer nature of instructors has been previously settled, and any critcism of its goals is a personal opinion of the larger goal of Tai Chi that is discussed in the main article. and you cant say that its held in low esteem, there are no surveys to back that up. besides, the society is about health and helping people not developing martial skill. most internal martial artists of good standing recognise and respect the differing goals and opinion. VanTucky 05:16, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

I rm'd the NPOV tag. You may think it is not neutral but one key facet from your objection is missing. If you read the npov page, it says specifically that neutrality means representing equally all published points of view. if you can find a reference that criticizes the Taoist Tai Chi Society that is not included, please rv the deletion. VanTucky 05:23, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Trademarking

apparentely, if you check out the various sites for the TTCS, the phrase "Taoist Tai Chi" is not trademarked. Is there any changes that should be made to the articles? Are we required to mention it, say in the title of the article for Taoist Tai Chi? VanTucky 18:06, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hierarchy

Regarding the added information of 2007/05/23: [1], fyi: of the three "Taoist Tai Chi Society", "The Gei Pang Lok Hup Academy", and Fung Loy Kok Institute of Taoism the FLKInstitute is the parent company. The information on the Lok Hup Academy should therefore be added there, not here. VanBurenen 20:06, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:TTCSlogo.gif

Image:TTCSlogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:48, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Fixed - Ahunt (talk) 22:24, 26 November 2007 (UTC)