User talk:Tanvirchowdhury

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Tanvirchowdhury, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  --Ragib 16:06, 20 January 2006 (UTC)


Contents

[edit] Copyright violation

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Chittagong Collegiate School, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. For more information about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, take a look at our Five Pillars. Happy editing! --Ragib 16:06, 20 January 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Little context in Camel strategy

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Camel strategy, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Camel strategy is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Camel strategy, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 04:30, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Best Air

A tag has been placed on Best Air requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 20:07, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Images at Muhammad

Hi, The consensus is to leave the images in at the article on Muhammad. You are invited to discuss the matter at Talk:Muhammad/images. Thanks, Silly rabbit (talk) 12:54, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Once again, please stop removing images from the article. You are invited to participate in discussion regarding the matter. If you are curious why images have been kept in the article, please read the FAQ. Silly rabbit (talk) 13:00, 22 February 2008 (UTC)