Talk:Tanya Byron

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Science and academia work group.

I'd quite like to add a picture to this page but this being my frist authored article I'm slightly worried about inadvertantly breaching copyright (that and the image servers are still having prolems). If anyone is a bit more confident in this area and can find a good pic of Tanya then please upload it. --Alibi 11:34, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] move

Page should probably be moved to Tanya Byron. "Dr(.)" is generally not prepended to titles of articles about people with doctoral degrees. dbtfztalk 20:44, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

  • This applies even to well-known people who are almost always referred to as "Dr.", e.g. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Phil McGraw. (Can't believe I used those two names in the same sentence.) dbtfztalk 20:46, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
Go for it Frelke 04:12, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Just felt the urge to fix a couple of typos in the main article. The author could spell psychology, but not university, which is odd. Just a keyboard slip I'm sure, because the uneducated don't bother contributing, but as a generalisation it seems that spelling is no longer important in todays world. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Warrenweasel (talk • contribs) 08:57, 21 April 2006.

...nor the use of the apostrophe, apparently. ElectricRay 22:32, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

I'm very sorry Warren. I'm sure I would have picked up on my mistake if it hadn't be for the fact that the misspelt link actually worked! TallAlex

[edit] Age and maiden name

Anyone know these?

Surely her maiden name is Sichel?

[edit] BSc MSc

Doesn't her MSc supersede her BSc, and so shouldn't be quoted in her title? Also, isn't the normal way (at least in the UK) to refer to people with doctorates as either Joe Bloggs PhD or Dr Joe Bloggs, never Dr Joe Bloggs PhD? I'm no expert on this but I'm pretty sure that this is the standard form in this country, unless Wikipedia adopts some other convention. BaseTurnComplete 11:31, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Tanya Byron.JPG

Image:Tanya Byron.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:21, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Tanyabyron frenchandsaunders.jpg

Image:Tanyabyron frenchandsaunders.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 21:48, 24 October 2007 (UTC)