Talk:Tantek Çelik

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of Computing WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to computers and computing. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received an rating on the importance scale.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tantek Çelik article.

Article policies
This article is part of WikiProject Macintosh. This means that the WikiProject has identified it as an article pertaining to the Macintosh, but is not currently working to improve it. WikiProject Macintosh itself is an attempt to improve, grow, standardize, and attain featured status for Wikipedia's articles related to Macintosh and Apple Inc. We need all your help, so join in today!
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale.
No This article is on a subject of no-importance within Macs for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]


[edit] Criticisms: Dave Sifry, Tantek Çelik

Both this and the Dave Sifry pages have a duplication of the 'Criticisms' section of the Technorati page. I think the information only belongs on the technorati page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 189.172.38.108 (talk) 17:17, 1 March 2007 (UTC).

Duplicated content is now gone. AlistairMcMillan 17:56, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Question on tense

When it says that he "was the Chief Technologist at Technorati," does that imply that as of the time of the last edit, he no longer is? This was confusing to me. The resume link in the References suggested that he is currently still Chief Technologist.Milkfish 23:51, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Cited a source for "was". Hope that makes it a bit clearer. AlistairMcMillan 02:06, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
That is a bit better. Perhaps the material in the cited page could be incorporated into the article (and perhaps into the Technorati article itself) to make it even more explicit. Milkfish 02:33, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Atheist?

It says he is an atheist at the bottom of the article but I don't see it in the article or anywhere. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rokkafellah (talkcontribs) 02:57, 25 April 2008 (UTC)