Talk:Tan Duc Thanh Nguyen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

Portal	Tan Duc Thanh Nguyen is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian crime.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

Media sources report his name as being both 'Tan' Duc Thanh Nguyen [1] [2] and 'Tach' Duc Thanh Nguyen [3] [4]. I'm unsure which is correct. -- Longhair 06:22, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

If you Google both names, you also get two different ages. "Tan Duc Thanh Nguyen" is often described as 23-years-old; while "Tach Duc Thanh Nguyen" is usually described as 27-years-old. FWIW, the 7:30 Report quoted Scott Rush as follows: "The person who recruited me was Tach Duc Thanh Nguyen, by offering me a free trip to Bali". Sarah Ewart (Talk) 07:07, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Tach Duc Thanh Nguyen ABC.jpg

Image:Tach Duc Thanh Nguyen ABC.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:23, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

You should take out "big gay homo" in the body of the text, no? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.38.197.195 (talk) 20:02, 6 March 2008 (UTC)