Talk:Tamagotchi Town
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Stub | This article has been rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale. | |
|
VG To-do:
|
||
Why speedy deletion?
It's part of Tamagotchi, which although not written up in a well-known journal, they exist, and most people have heard of them. They were a fad about 10 or so years ago.
This website is part of these toys, IT EXISTS. If you're saying that Tamagotchi's aren't significant, then yes, their website isn't either. But that's not the case.
Tristanb 21:45, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
- Nobody has tried to speedy delete this article, as far as I know. Tamagotchi is notable, no matter what anybody says. SuperDT 22:32, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, I think it was a unilateral decision by User:Coelacan – I can't find any discussion about it. He deletes a lot. Tristanb 07:17, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Tamatown.jpg
Image:Tamatown.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:02, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
