Talk:Talud-tablero
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Mesoamerica, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to pre-Columbian Mesoamerica, its civilizations, history, accomplishments and other topics. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page. |
|
Resources and guidelines for editing Mesoamerica-related articles:
|
|
| NB: Assessment ratings and other indicators given below are used by the Project in prioritising and managing its workload. | |
| Stub | This article has been rated as stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. |
| Mid | This article has been rated as mid-importance on the Project's importance scale. |
|
WikiProject Mesoamerica priority open tasks: (click "show" to expand)
|
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
[edit] Project importance rating
I haven't assessed the importance because I am not sure. As the dominant style of Teotihuacan and an important geopolitical indicator at other sites, I am tempted to rate it mid, but should it be considered more important that the buildings it describes? Eluchil404 13:43, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- I think mid should be ok- we've architectural overview articles for cultures (eg Maya architecture) as high, and this is probably one of the better-known architectural elements. Also, as an element you can run across it in a number of contexts and geographically-separated sites/regions, so in a way it's needed 'more', than say something which is purely a localised phenom. --cjllw | TALK 13:17, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
