Talk:Tales of Eternia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Really creepy because I would swear on my life that I remember renting a game from a local blockbuster called Tales of Eternia, it was in english too. (date of rental: Febuary 2001) As a note: It is a really good game.
Can anyone confirm that the name was changed due to copyright issues? I don't know what the title Tales of Destiny II would conflict with in the US. Tsunade 21:17, 28 November 2005 (UTC) --I don't know if it's confirmed per se, but if they already owned the copyright to the name Tales of Destiny they wouldn't need to pay for a copyright to the name Tales of Eternia.
I heard it was for marketting purposes. If people heard Tales of Destiny II, they'd know what to expect if they have played Tales of Destiny.
---It could be because He-Man was set in the world of Eternia, but my understanding was that the name was changed so that fans of Tales of Destiny would buy it.
[edit] Move?
Move to Tales of Destiny II? FlareNUKE 05:50, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- Well, there already is a "true" Tales of Destiny 2, and the original name of this one is/was Tales of Eternia. I guess sort of like the Final Fantasy IV article still being titled that even though it was released as Final Fantasy II. In the other regions (including the original Japanese), it's Eternia, so I wouldn't support moving it; a redirect should be enough. --melodiester 14:30, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Hey, I just wanna ask that wasn't Keele's university named Mintche University, not Minche? I just want to ask is it right or not before editing the article (cos I haven't played the game since 2002/2003)
[edit] PSP version?
Any chance someone could add some info about the PSP version of this game? I wouldn't know how to begin doing so, and there isn't even a mention of it in the article. - Yal
[edit] Greater Craymels and Aurora Arte Sections
Both of them look rather bad. The Greater Craymel section looks more like a FAQ rather than a section and the Divine Aurora Arte is riddled with spelling errors and also looks more like an FAQ. Should those sections be cleaned up and fleshed out, or would it be be better just outright remove them? Lanate 04:59, 15 February 2007 (UTC)