Talk:Tales from Watership Down

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Literature Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

The reason I changed Chocolateboy's link of "lapine mythology" is that the Lapine Wikipedia page to which the first word linked refers specifically to the Lapine language, and although Lapine-language words are included in TfWD, the vast majority of it is English. In other words, "Lapine mythology" and "lapine mythology" are not necessarily the same thing.

However, I thought that the best solution was to remove the confusion altogether by changing the phrase to "rabbit mythology". Loganberry 17:06, 10 Jul 2004 (UTC)

[edit] inhumed ?

I have not read the book, but is inhumed the correct word here?--Knulclunk 12:59, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Good spot. No, it isn't. Edited. Loganberry (Talk) 13:40, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Internationalism

This article suggests this is new, but the end of the original novel, which I just finished reading again, notes that this already happened. Indeed, this was one of Hazel's primary goals, and he realized it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ghamming (talk • contribs) 07:28, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cleanup

I cleaned up the article, and removed the two templates about cleanup and references. However, there is still a section called New concepts which contains original research. I added a tag, but if there is no citation found soon, I will remove it. Mr. Absurd (talk) 01:55, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

No citations were added, so it was removed. Mr. Absurd (talk) 01:22, 27 March 2008 (UTC)