Talk:Takuma Sakazaki
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| Low | This article is on a subject of low priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0. | |
|
VG To-do:
|
||
[edit] Mr. Karate
I thought Shin Mr. Karate was relevant enough to warrant a share of the article, since Takuma seems to parade as his alter ego all the time.-MegamanZero 18:39, September 19, 2005 (UTC)
- "simple" Mr. Karate might be worth it (and considering Ryo's use of the name in Fatal Fury Wild Ambition and NeoGeo Battle Collosseum, could even deserve its own article) - dunno about the Honki ni Natta version, since that's only present in SvC. I think I'll go tweak that specific section in the article. Loona 10:39, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
- I don't think so. "regular" Mr. Karate is mentioned in the second section, and since Mr.Karate and Takuma share the exact same moves, there's no need for another section. -MegamanZero 13:58 3,December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Weaker
- Growing weaker? Since when? In KOF2002 (which isn't canon anyway) Takuma seems to have purposely changed his fighting style to a more realistic discipline (like a version of karate) instead of using silly 'magic' fireballs and such. This doesn't mean he's weaker. Also, in SVC Chaos (which may or may not be canon) he retains the ability to throw fireballs until he's in his most devastating form "Serious Mr. Karate". He then switches to the special 'invisible' fireballs because they are supposed to be superior. If anything, he grows more powerful. This 'weaker' information should be removed. Mr.bonus 21:17, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:TakumaSakazaki.jpg
Image:TakumaSakazaki.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 21:25, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
