User talk:Tailindil
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello Tailindil, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! BlankVerse 16:00, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] European Youth Parliament
If you have some time the following week, what about making this article a WP:FA? You are the only person to edit the article for ages, and it has been on my list to bump it up to a good standard for a long time. I am watching this space. --User:Krator (t c) 10:32, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
-
- It's going to take a bit longer than a week because I'm a bit busy at the moment. What could be good would be if someone else from the EYP could help me out. Also, I'd probably need a typical list of sections to include (if you could help me with that, it would be great)
- I also need help with the technical stuff (i.e. I don't know how to put the source for the Charity Commission's enquiry results for example)
- Tailindil 11:49, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Ok. What is mostly needed is reliable, independent sources on the subject. This means, reports and articles by others than the organisation itself. If you can specify an email address in your profile, I will send you an e-mail via Special:Emailuser/Tailindil. --User:Krator (t c) 13:00, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Will do that. I'm having a little problem on the EYP article though. After thinking long and hard about it, I did not think that the whole crisis needed to be described in the History section, but that knowing that there had been problems within the Organisation between 2002 and 2004 was enough. Someone else replaced the material that I had deleted (written by myself) with the only explanation in the edit description that it was according to the Wikipedia policy of objectivity. However, I find the original version of my draft as lacking objectivity as it only described the events in negative terms. I don't really know how to reverse the changes without creating a whole fuss about it. Can you advice me on this? Tailindil 22:18, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Responded on article talk page. --User:Krator (t c) 23:07, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Will do that. I'm having a little problem on the EYP article though. After thinking long and hard about it, I did not think that the whole crisis needed to be described in the History section, but that knowing that there had been problems within the Organisation between 2002 and 2004 was enough. Someone else replaced the material that I had deleted (written by myself) with the only explanation in the edit description that it was according to the Wikipedia policy of objectivity. However, I find the original version of my draft as lacking objectivity as it only described the events in negative terms. I don't really know how to reverse the changes without creating a whole fuss about it. Can you advice me on this? Tailindil 22:18, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Ok. What is mostly needed is reliable, independent sources on the subject. This means, reports and articles by others than the organisation itself. If you can specify an email address in your profile, I will send you an e-mail via Special:Emailuser/Tailindil. --User:Krator (t c) 13:00, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
