Talk:Taipei 101

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Taipei 101 has been listed as one of the Arts good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
November 3, 2007 Good article nominee Listed

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject Taiwan      (Rated GA-Class) Taipei 101 is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a project to improve all Taiwan-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Taiwan-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome. GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. High This article has been rated as high-importance on the importance scale. Architecture WikiProject (Rated GA-Class) Architecture Portal This article covers subjects of relevance to Architecture. To participate, visit the WikiProject Architecture for more information. The current monthly improvement drive is Johannes Itten. GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale. High This article has been rated as high-importance on the assessment scale. WikiProject Skyscrapers (Rated GA-Class) Architecture Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, which aims to create, expand, and maintain articles that relate to skyscrapers, high-rises and towers. To participate, visit the project page for more information. GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale. Top This article has been rated as top-importance on the assessment scale.

Archives

/Archive 1 July 2003 – December 2007

[edit] The Reply of 12:31, 21 April 2008 edit

The modification is clear and significant. I am adding the references, information, links, notes and corrections. If you need, please tell me that make a list of all corrections and causes of this modification. --118.166.134.119 (=140.111.99.123, the same user) 08:20, 19 may 2008 (UTC)

Looks way better than the last time I saw. Good work on citing sources!

Someformofhuman Speak now! 00:58, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] the Chronology section

the Chronology section needs to be cleaned up... for som reason i cant do it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.172.116.27 (talk) 02:47, 10 June 2008 (UTC)