Talk:Taihō Code
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a project to improve all Japan-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Japan-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. |
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. |
|
Japan To-do:
|
|
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was move to Taihō Code. —Nightstallion (?) 11:14, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] "Code of Taiho" or "Taiho Code"?
I've always known it as the "Taiho Code", not the "Code of Taiho". A Google search using "Taiho Code" (with quotes for exact phrase search) turns up 517 results, while "Code of Taiho" turns up only 67 results, some of them Wikipedia-related. Also, "Code of Taiho" sounds awkward. I would like to propose having "Code of Taiho" redirect to "Taiho Code", rather than vice-versa.
[edit] Requested move
Code of Taihō → Taihō Code – per: 1. Taihō Code used more often. 2. Code of Taihō sounds awkward.
[edit] Survey
- Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
- Support For reasons mentioned above.--Sir Edgar 04:53, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
- Support sounds ok, and article could also start by Taiho code or Taiho Ritsuryo Tensaibuta 05:45, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
- Support. As the one who started this article and, I think, contributed the most, I am surprised to discover that all my books refer to either "Taiho Code" or "Taiho ritsuryo" and not The Code of Taiho. I wonder where I got that from. LordAmeth 10:05, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Results of Google Scholar and Google Books agree Taiho Code is more common. --Kusunose 10:37, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit] Here we go again - Korean influence on early Japan
Yes, we Wikipedians are encouraged to be bold. But as this issue of Korean influence on early Japan has been a hot topic on a number of different pages recently, some of them exploding into full-on edit wars, I am hoping that we can discuss this here, and hopefully reach some sort of compromise. As for my opinion, I acknowledge the importance of Korean cultural and political influences on the Yamato state. And I think that some mention of this is interesting to include in the article, provided it is accurate and relevant, even if it is not 100% necessary to an understanding of the topic. LordAmeth 02:48, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
