Talk:Tactical Communications Wing RAF

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Major Edit

Hi everyone! I've just given this article a major overhaul as it had a lot of erroneous information about 90 Signals Unit in it, which I feel should be it's own article! I also want to add a lot more information about TCW's rich history! If anyone has anything to add, go ahead! LookingYourBest 15:58, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Very much agree TCW and 90SU are very different beasts, the loss of the brand name was a singular and incredibly short sighted act of suicide. A dear departed 18:56, 15 Aug 2007 (UTC)

I've just removed an edit or two from the page stating that the almalgamation with 90SU was a "sad" event and the like. Although I wholeheartedly agree with the sentiment ... as I'm sure thousands of serving and ex-serving members of TCW would ... I feel it is unencyclopedic and without a proper source is simple WP:NPOV. I'll look for some way to source something about people not being happy about the move! LookingYourBest 20:11, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi fellow wingers! Ive just added sum stuff about the various exercises and trades that TCW and 90SU contain. Ill be adding more stuff over the comming months. Toffeeman22 19:05, 01 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi Toffeeman, cheers for your input! I've shuffled what you've written around a little bit and removed a little bit too. Op Titon isn't in the public domain and thus putting it on here with the location could be seen as a breach of opsec, so I was a bit tetchy about having it on the page. It can go back if you feel strongly about it though! I also removed a couple of lines about 90SU which I think would be perfect for the 90SU article (when it's created), but think too much info on 90SU on the TCW page would detract from it's history ... which I'm sure most Wingers hate enough already!

LookingYourBest (talk) 09:23, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Why do people keep insisting on putting this 'Fe@r' thing into the page? ive been on the wing for years now and don't know what it is so how could anybody get any encyclopedic advantage out of it? Toffeeman22 16:18, 12 December 2007