User talk:Ta bu shi da yu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


RETIRED


This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.
Archives
Archive 1
Archive 2
Archive 3
Archive 4
Archive 5
Archive 6
Archive 7
Archive 8
Archive 9
Archive 10
Archive 11
Archive 12
Leaving Wikipedia
Archive 13
Archive 14
whole section (deleted) missing
Archive 15
Archive 16
Archive 17
Archive 18
Archive 19
Archive 20
Archive 21
Archive 22
Archive 23
Archive 24
Archive 25
Archive 26
Archive 27
User:Ta bu shi da yu [edit]

Also scrambled password. Wikipedia, it was fun while it lasted. No sense of community here anymore (unless, of course, by "community" we mean AFD and MFD, but that's not something I want to be part of). I regret saying that I wish I hadn't formed WP:AN. It's a necessary evil. I guess where I was going with this was that I feel that to be part of WP:AN has almost become greater than editing articles on Wikipedia! That is my concern. - 211.30.71.131 (talk) 13:51, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] meh

Dude, you've still got a bro here.  :-) Tomertalk 10:09, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks Tomer. Sorry that it's turned out this way. - 211.30.71.131 (talk) 13:49, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

As someone who has similarly been around for a very long time, I have to say you're one of the editors I respected most. You say you will come back, I really hope it is so. RyanGerbil10(Говорить!) 01:00, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks mate. I appreciate all the hard work you've put into this project. I hope things go OK around here. Especially on TfD. - 211.30.71.131 (talk) 13:49, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

I haven't really known you, but you have been remarkably influential to the development of the Wiki. I can only hope you'll continue to do the same. Best of luck to you and your family. bibliomaniac15 03:09, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Cheers... I very much appreciate the encouraging words! - 211.30.71.131 (talk) 13:49, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

The block imposed on you was ridiculous, and was not supported by policy. Please don't allow some foolish mistake to end your fantastic wiki-career. I'm not even sure we've spoken directly, but I've admired your contributions for a very long time. I look forward to your return whenever you're ready. Best wishes, Xoloz (talk) 13:57, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Well... the one who did it did what they thought was right. I do admire that. However, I appreciate your comments Xoloz, I wish things weren't as they were. -- 211.30.71.131 (talk) 13:49, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
FYI, although this account is inactive, TBSDY has not gone anywhere[1] and resumed editing almost immediately after his purported retirement. That should put your minds at ease. I'm sure he could even start another account and resume his admin status w/o confirmation, as many others have done.--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back (talk) 14:03, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Don't worry Fat Man, the addiction will wear off eventually for me. Incidently, love your personal attack on my old talk page. Do you feel like a big man? - 211.30.71.131 (talk) 05:40, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Don't count on it. I locked myself out of editing for 6 weeks and still the siren's call of Wikipedia pulled me back in. Though, to be fair, the community ain't what she used to be. Regardless, I hope your present feelings of frustration will pass. Dragons flight (talk) 07:29, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Regretfully, it really is my intention to leave and never come back. It probably will let me reassess what is most important in my life though, so that's a good thing. I do feel very sad that I'm leaving behind so many great editors. We've all been through so much and weathered so much criticism (which we almost always tried to take into consideration) that it's like leaving behind a family. But... this is an online project. It's not family, though when I started it was one of the most encouraging, funny, nice, friendly web communities around. Sure there were trolls, some of them really bad, but even then Jimbo tried to inculcate a spirit of forgiveness. I can't remember who it was, but he got blocked for a year for disruption. We all thought that it would be forever, but Jimbo impressed me with a real attempt at allowing the editor back with some mediation and mentorship. I was impressed that Jimbo would take the time to do this, I never forgot what he did there (even if I forgot the editors name) - it really stuck in my mind. Unfortunately, things have changed. Funny. It's like the history of Christianity. Christianity started out great, then after Constantine decided that the Roman Empire should be Christian, people who didn't care about the core tenets of Christianity came in seeking power and started corrupting it. It's similar to what I see happening here. Of course Wikipedia is full of heathens, so the comparison probably isn't valid... <joke>. So I wish it weren't so, but it's time to move on. Soon I'll not add anything more to this page (yes, it will take a little time to get this out of my system), but it will happen. Give me time - I've been on the Wikicrack for 5 years now, going cold turkey is almost impossible! Now to work out what I'm going to spend all my free time on... think I'll go learn about Oracle Databases. - 211.30.71.131 (talk) 13:38, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Replied on my talk page. You know, people around here really, honestly seem to care for you and hold you in high esteem, even if I don't. So why let one mean-spirited jerk-off get under your skin? Just take a break and stop with the drama. I'll do my part by disengaging as well.--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back (talk) 07:01, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
What I wrote on The Fat Man Who Never Came Back's user talk page.
In case you hadn't noticed, there are a few things about this project that were always important.
  1. Don't troll others, and don't be nasty to them. If your humour was designed to hurt another, don't do it. The humour on Wikipedia is meant to be gentle, not harsh. Hard humour designed to bring down another is not conducive to editing on this project, nor collaboration. There is enough conflict without someone's lack of regard for another to cause more hurt and pain.
  2. I am perfectly able to keep my real life separate from the editing I do on this project. Like I said, things in my normal life are great, except for a bit of sickness I've had for a few days. Yeah, it's a bit stressful, but that's what happens when your wife is pregnant and money is tight with a new-born on the way. However, this doesn't mean that I'm not extremely sad that this project has turned into a horrible blame-fest, with no way of people to make mistakes, or to speak their mind, or to leave without someone leaving a nasty comment on their user talk page. I've been on this project for almost 5 years, and you are one of the very few that I've seen who left a "don't let the door hit you on the arse" style comment. Mostly when someone leaves from disappointment, other editors refrain from commenting, or at the very least note what they didn't like in a very short comment (as in "I didn't agree with that you did such-and-such") and don't make a personal comment designed to be hurtful.
  3. I have no intention of returning to editing. Like I said, I scrambled my account. I'm only coming back to respond to comments like the ones you left me. I certainly didn't expect for people to be horrible to me on my talk page, or to accuse me of having a sock-puppet when I log in and edit anonymously (?!?).
  4. I have contributed quite a bit to this project (for instance, I spent two years writing the USA PATRIOT Act article), and have tried to make sure that I never misused admin tools. I think that is why long-time, valuable contributors aren't particularly happy I'm leaving. I feel sorry for those in the trenches. Unfortunately, many feel the way I do and are deeply saddened that the old spirit of forgiveness, Wikilove and community is being eroded by those who only want to do meta-editing, vandal hunting and casting judgement on others. There is certainly more of that now on Wikipedia than there is of actual quality editing of Wikipedia articles. It also means a lot less recognition for those who do the bulk of the work in getting topics and articles up to speed in terms of quality. I definitely encourage any editor to remember the core goal of Wikipedia, which is to contribute the sum total of all knowledge. I do know that writing nasty comments on talk pages doesn't help that at all, all it does is make more good contributors leave. It does allow more people in who only want to be involved in making decisions for the project but who don't really care about editing articles.
So before you decide to post a "witty" comment on someone else's talk page, think about whether it's there to judge them and bring them down, or whether you really want them to stay and produce good contributions for Wikipedia. - 211.30.71.131 (talk) 13:24, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Wow, I really, really hurt your feelings; sorry for that. Perhaps I overreacted to the distasteful way you've behaved over the past few days; I really expect long-time editors and admins to be exemplars, but when they fuck up, that's no excuse for me to be mean. I wasn't saying anything close to "don't let the door hit you on the way out," nor did I ever suggest that my comment was particularly witty. I was merely alerting others who were mourning your departure that you never actually left; however, when I re-read my comment it sounded awfully mean-spirited, which is one of several reasons I deleted it (only for you to restore it). Yes, I'm unfamiliar with the scale and quality of your magisterial contributions--and I never claimed to be your equal in experience or utility to the project--but you're none too familiar with my behavior as an editor, either. I do have a good idea what Wikipedia's all about and don't need to be lectured via enumerated do's and dont's by someone I don't really look up to or care to emulate. Nobody's perfect, and we've both had our ill-advised moments; my humor can be inappropriate or dark, but if you really look at my interactions with other editors, you'll find that I get along great with a wide assortment of people; I'm sweet, patient and helpful more often than not. I meant it when I said not to let let one online jerk-off effect your mood. It's not worth it. If you truly see me as nothing but a troll, you should really stop feeding me. Please go in peace.--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back (talk) 14:22, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
You know, I've often written comments on people's pages that I regret later. It takes a big man (really, no pun intended here!) to say what you just said, and I appreciate it. The more Wikilove, the better. I didn't really see you as a troll, but your comment did upset me. But... the comment above does make things right. I very much appreciate you saying it, and no more hard feelings on my end anymore. I hope that any bad feelings that I've caused could be forgiven on your end also. It's been a tough WikiWeek for me.
It is tough for me to leave. I have done a lot of stuff on this project... I guess I only said this because I was justifying my existence here to you and I wanted you to know how very much I regret the way things have turned out. It's an awfully hard thing to do to leave Wikipedia, I tried it once, left for 6 months and came back again. This time it's not really viable to do so, things have changed a lot from the first time. That's why this time I have scrambled my account so I can't get back in. - 211.30.71.131 (talk) 14:42, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

I feel your pain. I also miss the old sense of community, common purpose, and shared values. Knowing that the current fragmentation is inevitable doesn't make it easier to watch. I mostly keep my head down and my eye on my watchlist, not on the drama. I hope you do come back eventually, as your presence will be missed, at least among those who are familiar with your intelligence and wit. Go, relax, invent a cocktail called "the exploding whale", and come back when you're ready to face some small corner of the maelstrom again. Cheers! — Catherine\talk 08:03, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks Catherine. I shall certainly consider making that cocktail: I wonder whether it would be OR to add it to Exploding whale article? Keep up the good work, btw. I totally think you are a great editor, wish there were more of you about! - 211.30.71.131 (talk) 13:49, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

...good Zinglon? Don't go off so soon! You're just contributing to Wikigeddon! -- Altiris Helios Exeunt 10:27, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Wow shit, the best are leaving in spades. Um. Yeah well, take your time, all you need and want, and then fucking return. I dorftrottel I talk I 06:52, December 3, 2007

[edit] Hooroo

Hi Ta bu,

I'm sad to see you go, but it's probably for the best. If anybody edits wikipedia because they feel they "have to" or absolutely "need to" rather than because they want to, then that'd be a problem.

I think as time goes on, the temptation for people to vandalise or POV-push on wikipedia will decline. The lack of such problems may make wikipedia a less paranoid place (or maybe more paranoid - but I hope not!).

Best of luck, Andjam (talk) 14:32, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] DRV notices

  • An editor has asked for a deletion review of Pros from Dover. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. -- Jreferee t/c 19:37, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
  • An editor has asked for a deletion review of Pax_Galaxia. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. -- Jreferee t/c 19:44, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:PDcapture1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:PDcapture1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:17, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Windows XP FAR

Windows XP has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:31, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ni hao!

  • sui1 ran2 ni3 bu4 shi4 da4 yu2, dan4 shi4 wo3 men2 hui4 xiang3 nian4 ni3. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 11:16, 30 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ESP-print-manager.png

Thanks for uploading Image:ESP-print-manager.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:13, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:IRiver logo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:IRiver logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:48, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of William Jefferson Blythe, Jr.

An editor has nominated William Jefferson Blythe, Jr., an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Jefferson Blythe, Jr. and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 23:59, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Column 8

I have nominated Column 8, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Column 8. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Jfire (talk) 07:22, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re. Are you OK?

Responded at User talk:220.237.96.135. Ral315 (talk) 10:54, 14 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Two-babylons.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Two-babylons.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:46, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Template:Citeorg

A tag has been placed on Template:Citeorg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 00:22, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Yikes!

How mournful I am to find you truly retired. I hope to see you again one day. +sj + 19:03, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Template:Message box left

A tag has been placed on Template:Message box left requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:09, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Win2kserver logo.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Win2kserver logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Alexfusco5 00:28, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Template:USCityBox

A tag has been placed on Template:USCityBox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 20:51, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Feautured article review begun

Btrieve has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here.--Jayron32.talk.contribs 21:17, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Template:Bref

A tag has been placed on Template:Bref requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:25, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Image:Btrieve for Windows 95NT Workstation config.PNG

A tag has been placed on Image:Btrieve for Windows 95NT Workstation config.PNG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hennessey, Patrick (talk) 05:56, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Moore_Theological_College_Crest.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Moore_Theological_College_Crest.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 02:20, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Mandrake-cups-gui.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Mandrake-cups-gui.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 02:22, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Alfredtsang.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Alfredtsang.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 02:24, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Replaceable fair use Image:Alfredtsang.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Alfredtsang.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. RoninBK T C 13:37, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:NSIDC_logo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:NSIDC_logo.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:25, 31 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 17:25, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] TfD nomination of Template:ProseTimeline

Template:ProseTimeline has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 17:55, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Notice of Wikimedia Australia incorporation meeting

Dear Wikimedian,

I am writing to you as your named is listed at http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Australia under "People interested in helping to create a local chapter". Wikimedia Australia's draft rules have been approved by the Wikimedia Foundation, and we now intend to incorporate in the state of Victoria. You are hereby informed of the intention to hold a Wikimedia Australia meeting on 20th April 2008 with the intention to

(a) authorize a person who has attained the age of 18 years and who is resident in the State to incorporate Wikimedia Australia under the Victorian Associations Incorporation Act 1981; [that is, elect a Public Officer] (b) approve a proposed statement of purposes of Wikimedia Australia; and (c) approve the proposed rules of Wikimedia Australia.

A majority of members must vote to pass the motion to incorporate as an association, for it to meet the requirements of the Act.

The proposed rules, and proposed statement of purpose, can be found here:

http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Australia/Draft_Rules_for_Wikimedia_Australia_Inc

Details of the incorporation meeting, including local meetings (to be joined up by teleconferencing, with any luck) and the agenda, can be found here:

http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Australia/Incorporation


In particular, you are invited to attend the Melbourne meeting:

I also encourage you to take part in discussion on the mailing list: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/Wikimediaau-l

If you are unable to attend, you can vote by proxy. Please copy the proxy form at http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Australia/Proxy_form and send it to me in an email. (It is better to appoint a generic member, e.g. "Meeting Chair" or "Acting Secretary", both of whom will be of Melbourne, rather than a specific member, but the choice is yours.)

If you have any questions please don't hesitate to ask.

Yours sincerely, Brianna Laugher Provisional Secretary, Wikimedia Australia

special:emailuser/pfctdayelise skype/irc/wikipedia/meta/commons: pfctdayelise

[edit] G'day

G'day esteemed person who has expressed interest in Sydney based meetups at this page (I hope that's the correct wording for the formal greeting!!). You may have heard that Australia is to have its very own 'chapter' of the Wikimedia Foundation - and further, there's a meeting coming up to discuss / enact the chapter's incorporation (details here). I'm afraid that I don't know too much about the details of what this entails, other than having a private hope that we might get a secret handshake, and maybe cheap coffee at wikimania (this is a poor attempt at humour - I'm sure that the Chapter's do great work, and it's a good thing that Australia is to have one).

If you're interested in meeting up this weekend (the set date is the 20th) - or later, then please do head over here and sign up, or make a comment at the talk page... the drive to create the chapter has largely come from another town in Australia that I'm afraid I haven't actually heard much about.. and anything they can do.... right? - cheers, Privatemusings (talk) 11:11, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Drinks and a wiki chat?

G'day sydneysider - fancy a 'not quite a meetup but a few drinks' sort of thing? - We can chat about the new aussie chapter, the price of eggs and have our very own 2020 Wiki Summit! - or just sink a couple of cold ones and gass bag about the good 'ol days of wiki, when an editor could get some repsect (not a typo)! I've suggested something here so take a look and sign up if you're up for it... cheers, Privatemusings (talk) 02:27, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] "the most prolific thing they will ever have created"

Andrew Gray here on May 6, 2008 says:

http://www.bustedtees.com/Wikipedia

  WIKIPEDIA
 IS ACCURATE
(citation needed)

Whoever was actually responsible for coming up with 
{{fact}}, they may want to resign themselves to it 
perhaps being the most prolific thing they will ever have 
created...

That appears to be you. WAS 4.250 (talk) 20:41, 6 May 2008 (UTC)