Talk:T-Bone Burnett

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to musicians and musical groups on Wikipedia.


This article is part of WikiProject Texas, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Texas.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Contents

[edit] T-Bone vs. T Bone

Since T Bone's preferred spelling now is without the hyphen, wouldn't it be more appropriate to make T Bone Burnett the article title with a redirect from T-Bone Burnett? Mitchell k dwyer 19:55, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

Excellent point -- T Bone dropped the hyphen back in the '80s. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.118.141.120 (talk • contribs) 12:45, 22 January 2006 (UTC) (signed, Donald Joseph)
Wikipedia:Naming conventions (common names) requires what is more common and Wikipedia:Naming conventions (identity) requires what T Bone himself uses. Hyacinth 08:05, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Narrow point of view

Coming to the article as a non-American with no prior knowledge of T Bone's career, wanting to find out all about him, it seems to have been written from a rather narrow twenty-first century point of view. Of course, I appreciate what "T Bone Burnett is an American original" is getting at, but I'd rather be given, at the outset of the article, a more bland and less starry eyed summary of the man. We are told first of his recent achievements, and then of his (equally important?) achievements earlier in his career--not, I would have thought, the encyclopedic way of doing it. Sorry to moan! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.92.154.118 (talk • contribs) 16:01 & 16:03, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

That prose really has the feel of text copied from elsewhere, though Google does not find it on the web. --Kbh3rdtalk 03:22, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
The text is a press release authored by Sony/Columbia Records. It's now up on the very new Sony T Bone page, which is why Google didn't find it for you. A real encyclopedia entry would include more personal info, like that he was married to Sam Phillips for a decade. And, the text likely violates capyright, since Sony/Columbia no doubt owns the copyright to the text in the press release. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.209.107.39 (talk • contribs) 19:09, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Possible copryight violation?

I followed 24.209.107.39's tip that the text was a copyright violation, and I found two sites I think were originally copied from, though in the first case with minor textual modification and in the second being edited in the time that the text has existed here on Wikipedia.

  1. [1] & [2] for the "14-year hiatus" line
  2. [3] (a Columbia Records press release) for the same line and for more

I think that this should be tagged as a {{copyvio}}, but am not entirely sure. At any rate, it does need major textual modification, because someone could certainly claim it is a copyright violation. What do you guys think?

--Iamunknown 17:04, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:T Bone Burnett - TTFI Cover.jpg

Image:T Bone Burnett - TTFI Cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:52, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:T Bone Burnett - TT Cover.jpg

Image:T Bone Burnett - TT Cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:52, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

What's strange is that the photo in question took the place of one which I had photographed myself, donated to the commons under GFDL, but was somehow rejected. Furthermore, there is obviously no one else who is willing to take any credit for editing the article or even to donate a non-promotional photo. Do what you will, okay? Kulturvultur (talk) 07:24, 3 June 2008 (UTC)